Literature DB >> 11516788

Intranasal vaccination against plague, tetanus and diphtheria.

H O Alpar1, J E Eyles, E D Williamson, S Somavarapu.   

Abstract

Plague is an extremely virulent and potentially lethal infection caused by the bacterium Y. pestis. The current vaccine used to immunise against plague often fails to engender solid (100%) protection against inhalational infection with Y. pestis. Similarly, logistical factors favour the development of non-parenteral immunisation protocols to counter plague. Recently an improved parenteral vaccination strategy for plague, based on the recombinant subunit approach, has entered clinical trails. The Yersinia pestis subunit antigens (F1 and V) have been successfully incorporated into novel vaccine delivery systems such as biodegradable microspheres composed of poly-L-(lactide) (PLLA). Intranasal and intratracheal administration of PLLA microencapsulated F1 and V serves to protect experimental animals from inhalational and subcutaneous challenge with virulent Y. pestis bacilli. Liposomes have also been used to improve the immunogenicity of intranasally administered Y. pestis antigens, and the effectiveness of this approach to plague immunisation has been evaluated. Tetanus and diphtheria still cause many deaths worldwide. The maintenance of protective immunity to diphtheria and tetanus requires booster injections of the currently licensed toxoid vaccines. Consequently, many people remain unprotected. Improved coverage may well result from the development of effective non-invasive vaccines that could be readily distributed and potentially self-administered. To this end, the intranasal and inhalational routes of administration have been extensively investigated. Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids have been delivered intranasally to experimental animals using a wide variety of adjuvants (enterotoxin derivatives), penetration enhancers (cyclodextrins, bile salts, surfactants, cationic polymers) and delivery systems (microspheres and liposomes). As compared with parenteral vaccination, nasal immunisation has been shown favourably effective in small animal models, and a limited number of early phase clinical trails. As a caveat to this, adjuvantisation of toxoid/subunit molecules appears to be a requisite for elicitation of appreciable immunological responses, following nasal administration of acellular immunogens. Testing in larger animal models and humans is needed to ascertain if the promising results obtained in rodents can be reciprocated without compromising safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11516788     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00166-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  13 in total

1.  In Vivo Toxicity and Immunological Characterization of Detoxified Recombinant Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A.

Authors:  Easwaran Ravichandran; Pavithra Janardhanan; Kruti Patel; Stephen Riding; Shuowei Cai; Bal Ram Singh
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Significant systemic and mucosal immune response induced on oral delivery of diphtheria toxoid using nano-bilosomes.

Authors:  Anshuman Shukla; Bhupinder Singh; O P Katare
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin spikes local inflammation that induces Th2 cell and T follicular helper cell responses to the coadministered antigen.

Authors:  Motoyasu Onishi; Koji Ozasa; Kouji Kobiyama; Keiichi Ohata; Mitsutaka Kitano; Keiichi Taniguchi; Tomoyuki Homma; Masanori Kobayashi; Akihiko Sato; Yuko Katakai; Yasuhiro Yasutomi; Edward Wijaya; Yoshinobu Igarashi; Noriyuki Nakatsu; Wataru Ise; Takeshi Inoue; Hiroshi Yamada; Alexis Vandenbon; Daron M Standley; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Cevayir Coban; Taiki Aoshi; Etsushi Kuroda; Ken J Ishii
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Trivalent vaccine against botulinum toxin serotypes A, B, and E that can be administered by the mucosal route.

Authors:  Easwaran Ravichandran; Fetweh H Al-Saleem; Denise M Ancharski; Mohammad D Elias; Ajay K Singh; Mohammad Shamim; Yujing Gong; Lance L Simpson
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Platform technology to deliver prophylactic molecules orally: an example using the Class A select agent Yersinia pestis.

Authors:  Beatriz del Rio; Jesus Lajara Fuente; Vera Neves; Raymond Dattwyler; Jos F M L Seegers; Maria Gomes-Solecki
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-08-08       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Lipid A mimetics are potent adjuvants for an intranasal pneumonic plague vaccine.

Authors:  Christina L Airhart; Harold N Rohde; Carolyn J Hovde; Gregory A Bohach; Claudia F Deobald; Stephen S Lee; Scott A Minnich
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 7.  Intranasal and oral vaccination with protein-based antigens: advantages, challenges and formulation strategies.

Authors:  Shujing Wang; Huiqin Liu; Xinyi Zhang; Feng Qian
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 14.870

8.  Induction of Dendritic Cell Maturation and Activation by a Potential Adjuvant, 2-Hydroxypropyl-β-Cyclodextrin.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Kim; Cheol-Heui Yun; Seung Hyun Han
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Effect of Melittin on Metabolomic Profile and Cytokine Production in PMA-Differentiated THP-1 Cells.

Authors:  Abdulmalik M Alqarni; Valerie A Ferro; John A Parkinson; Mark J Dufton; David G Watson
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-13

Review 10.  Nasal delivery of high molecular weight drugs.

Authors:  Yildiz Ozsoy; Sevgi Gungor; Erdal Cevher
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.