Literature DB >> 11516261

Differences in the behaviour of Sprague--Dawley and Lewis rats during repeated passive avoidance procedure: effect of amphetamine.

O Kaminsky1, V Klenerova, J Stöhr, P Sida, S Hynie.   

Abstract

The present paper investigated the differences in passive avoidance learning between Sprague--Dawley and Lewis rats. After initial habituation (experimental Part 1), measured as latencies to enter the dark, preferable compartment, the effect of treatment with amphetamine (8 mg kg(-1)b.w.), the retention performance compared with controls (saline) was tested in both rat strains in Parts 2--4. The intervals between Parts 2--4 were 24 or 49 days. Each experimental part consisted of testing lasting 6 days. On the 7th day the rats received drug treatment 1 h before the application of foot shock. The differences between rat strains were already detectable at the beginning of the study. During the repeated exposures of rats in Part 1, only Lewis rats, in contrast to Sprague--Dawley rats, exhibited the habituation. The repeated testing of rats in Parts 2--4, due to previous experience with an aversive stimulus, was considered as the retention test. In Parts 2--3 we observed only minor differences in the responses of both rat strains tested. Also no significant differences were observed between rat strains after amphetamine treatment that induced an amnesia-like effect in all retention trials. However, data shown in Part 4 revealed the largest differences between both strains. Control Lewis rats exhibited significantly higher retention responses than Sprague--Dawley rats. In the latter strain we observed no differences in avoidance latencies between controls and amphetamine treated rats. In Lewis rats the difference in avoidance performance between controls and amphetamine treated animals was highly significant due to their enhanced retention performance. In conclusion, the results presented in this study extend the known behavioural differences in tested rat strains to the passive avoidance procedure that, in addition, was performed for a total period of 4 months. Due to a known deficiency of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis activity in Lewis rats it can be hypothesized that the behavioural dissociation of this strain from Sprague--Dawley rats could be related to the different activity of this regulatory axis in the rat strains tested. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11516261     DOI: 10.1006/phrs.2001.0848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  7 in total

1.  Strain-dependent urethral response.

Authors:  Donna J Haworth; Takeya Kitta; Brian Morelli; Douglas W Chew; Naoki Yoshimura; William C de Groat; David A Vorp
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.696

2.  Proteomic analysis of chronic restraint stress-induced Gan (肝)-stagnancy syndrome in rats.

Authors:  Xue-gang Sun; Xiao-lan Zhong; Zhi-feng Liu; Hong-bing Cai; Qin Fan; Qi-rui Wang; Qiang Liu; Yu-hong Song; Song-qi He; Xu-fu Zhang; Zhi-ping Lu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 1.978

3.  Brain Angiotensin II AT1 receptors are involved in the acute and long-term amphetamine-induced neurocognitive alterations.

Authors:  Natalia Andrea Marchese; Emilce Artur de laVillarmois; Osvaldo Martin Basmadjian; Mariela Fernanda Perez; Gustavo Baiardi; Claudia Bregonzio
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Comparison of three strains of diabetic rats with respect to the rate at which retinopathy and tactile allodynia develop.

Authors:  T S Kern; C M Miller; J Tang; Y Du; S L Ball; L Berti-Matera
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 2.367

5.  Proteomic Analysis of Liver Proteins in a Rat Model of Chronic Restraint Stress-Induced Depression.

Authors:  Cong Li; Zhengguang Guo; Ronghua Zhao; Wei Sun; Ming Xie
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 6.  Avoidance learning: a review of theoretical models and recent developments.

Authors:  Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Marieke Effting; Merel Kindt; Tom Beckers
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Inhibitory learning of phototaxis by honeybees in a passive-avoidance task.

Authors:  Paul Marchal; Maria Eugenia Villar; Haiyang Geng; Patrick Arrufat; Maud Combe; Haydée Viola; Isabelle Massou; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.460

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.