BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of assays for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), and antipancreatic antibody (PAB) in different laboratories is unknown. Likewise, the sensitivity and diagnostic usefulness of these assays in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the community is unknown. METHODS: An incidence cohort of 290 patients with IBD were offered participation in the study. Blood was obtained from 162 patients (56%) (83 with ulcerative colitis, 79 with Crohn's disease) who agreed to participate. ANCA was determined in five laboratories. ASCA in two laboratories, and PAB in one laboratory. RESULTS: In ulcerative colitis, the sensitivity of ANCA determined in five laboratories varied widely, ranging from 0-63%. In Crohn's disease, the sensitivity of ASCA determined in two laboratories did not vary significantly, ranging from 39-44%; and the sensitivity of PAB determined in one laboratory was 15%. The optimal diagnostic usefulness was obtained from one laboratory where the positive predictive values of a positive ANCA assay combined with a negative ASCA assay for ulcerative colitis, and a negative ANCA combined with a positive ASCA for Crohn's disease, were 75% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD, the sensitivity of ANCA varied widely in different laboratories, whereas the prevalence of ASCA was similar. The positive predictive values of the ANCA assay combined with the ASCA assay for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are high enough to be clinically useful.
BACKGROUND: The sensitivity of assays for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA), anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody (ASCA), and antipancreatic antibody (PAB) in different laboratories is unknown. Likewise, the sensitivity and diagnostic usefulness of these assays in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in the community is unknown. METHODS: An incidence cohort of 290 patients with IBD were offered participation in the study. Blood was obtained from 162 patients (56%) (83 with ulcerative colitis, 79 with Crohn's disease) who agreed to participate. ANCA was determined in five laboratories. ASCA in two laboratories, and PAB in one laboratory. RESULTS: In ulcerative colitis, the sensitivity of ANCA determined in five laboratories varied widely, ranging from 0-63%. In Crohn's disease, the sensitivity of ASCA determined in two laboratories did not vary significantly, ranging from 39-44%; and the sensitivity of PAB determined in one laboratory was 15%. The optimal diagnostic usefulness was obtained from one laboratory where the positive predictive values of a positive ANCA assay combined with a negative ASCA assay for ulcerative colitis, and a negative ANCA combined with a positive ASCA for Crohn's disease, were 75% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with IBD, the sensitivity of ANCA varied widely in different laboratories, whereas the prevalence of ASCA was similar. The positive predictive values of the ANCA assay combined with the ASCA assay for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are high enough to be clinically useful.
Authors: B Vander Cruyssen; H Peeters; I E A Hoffman; D Laukens; P Coucke; D Marichal; C Cuvelier; E Remaut; E M Veys; H Mielants; M De Vos; F De Keyser Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Stefan Müller; Maya Styner; Beatrice Seibold-Schmid; Beatrice Flogerzi; Michael Mähler; Astrid Konrad; Frank Seibold Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: James Markowitz; Subra Kugathasan; Marla Dubinsky; Ling Mei; Wallace Crandall; Neal LeLeiko; Maria Oliva-Hemker; Joel Rosh; Jonathan Evans; David Mack; Anthony Otley; Marian Pfefferkorn; Ron Bahar; Eric Vasiliauskas; Ghassan Wahbeh; Gary Silber; J Antonio Quiros; Iwona Wrobel; Justin Nebel; Carol Landers; Yoanna Picornell; Stephan Targan; Trudy Lerer; Jeffrey Hyams Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.325