Literature DB >> 11515714

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised cross-over clinical trial of NIPRISAN in patients with Sickle Cell Disorder.

C Wambebe1, H Khamofu, J A Momoh, M Ekpeyong, B S Audu, O S Njoku, E A Bamgboye, R N Nasipuri, O O Kunle, J I Okogun, M N Enwerem, J G Audam, K S Gamaniel, O O Obodozie, B Samuel, G Fojule, O Ogunyale.   

Abstract

The study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of NIPRISAN, a phytomedicine, developed for the management of patients with Sickle Cell Disorder (SCD). The study design is a placebo-controlled double blind cross-over trial. Eighty-two (82) patients with SCD were recruited and randomised into two groups. An initial 4 month pre-trial study was undertaken to determine the similarity of the groups. The main study was conducted over a twelve-month period with crossover at six months. Safety of the drug was assessed clinically and biochemically. NIPRISAN significantly (P < 0.01) reduced the frequency of SCD crisis associated with severe pains. Acute toxicity to the liver assessed by the activities of liver enzymes, indicate that NIPRISAN is safe. Renal function assessed by the serum levels of creatinine and blood urea nitrogen remained normal. Both the clinical and laboratory results of the present phase IIB (pivot) clinical study suggest that NIPRISAN is a safe and efficacious phytomedicine for the management of patients with Sickle Cell Disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11515714     DOI: 10.1078/0944-7113-00040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phytomedicine        ISSN: 0944-7113            Impact factor:   5.340


  20 in total

1.  Capacity for clinical research on herbal medicines in Africa.

Authors:  Merlin Willcox; Nandi Siegfried; Quinton Johnson
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.579

2.  Pharmacological management of sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Uche Anadu Ndefo; Angie Eaton Maxwell; Huong Nguyen; Tochukwu L Chiobi
Journal:  P T       Date:  2008-04

Review 3.  Treating sickle cell disease by targeting HbS polymerization.

Authors:  William A Eaton; H Franklin Bunn
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Effect of NIPRISAN® on CYP3A4 activity in vitro.

Authors:  Bulus Adzu; Collen Masimirembwa; Kudirat Bola Mustapha; Roslyn Thelingwani; Rukaiyatu Abdullahi Kirim; Karniyus Shingu Gamaniel
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 2.441

5.  Red blood cell transfusion to treat or prevent complications in sickle cell disease: an overview of Cochrane reviews.

Authors:  Patricia M Fortin; Sally Hopewell; Lise J Estcourt
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 6.  Pharmacotherapeutical strategies in the prevention of acute, vaso-occlusive pain in sickle cell disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joep W R Sins; David J Mager; Shyrin C A T Davis; Bart J Biemond; Karin Fijnvandraat
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-08-22

Review 7.  Pharmacotherapy in sickle cell disease--state of the art and future prospects.

Authors:  Jane Hankins; Banu Aygun
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  Therapeutic strategies for sickle cell disease: towards a multi-agent approach.

Authors:  Marilyn J Telen; Punam Malik; Gregory M Vercellotti
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 9.  Phytomedicines and nutraceuticals: alternative therapeutics for sickle cell anemia.

Authors:  Ngozi Awa Imaga
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-14

10.  Traditional herbal management of sickle cell anemia: lessons from Nigeria.

Authors:  Sunday J Ameh; Florence D Tarfa; Benjamin U Ebeshi
Journal:  Anemia       Date:  2012-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.