Literature DB >> 11515702

Outcome assessment in psychiatric service evaluation.

L Hansson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present paper gives an overview of outcome assessment issues in psychiatric service evaluation, based on seven proposals concerning the content and methodology of outcome assessment. It is stressed that outcome assessments should be performed on both the system and the patient level and that multiple outcome domains should be used, reflecting multiple perspectives of the services. It is also argued that outcome studies benefit from incorporating service use measures in order to enable analyses of costs and cost-effectiveness of services. Outcome studies of community-based psychiatric services have so far mainly investigated service models or programs.
CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that there is a need to investigate the relationship between particular parts and content of services and outcome, in order to increase knowledge of what is effective in community-based psychiatric services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11515702     DOI: 10.1007/s001270170055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  9 in total

1.  The relationship between symptomatic changes and perceived improvement among patients treated in Brazilian community mental health services.

Authors:  Mário César Rezende Andrade; Marina Bandeira; Michel Perreault; Antonio Paulo Angélico; Marcos Santos de Oliveira
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2012-09

2.  Deconstructing the 'black box' of the Camberwell assessment of need score in mental health services evaluation.

Authors:  Erik Wennström; Lars Berglund; Johan Lindbäck; Frits-Axel Wiesel
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  [Assessment of quality indicators with routine data: Presentation of a feasibility test in ten specialist clinics for psychiatry and psychotherapy].

Authors:  I Großimlinghaus; P Falkai; W Gaebel; A Hasan; M Jänner; B Janssen; D Reich-Erkelenz; L Grüber; V Böttcher; T Wobrock; J Zielasek
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 4.  [Care requirements for severe mental disorders. Scientific evidence for integration of clinical psychiatry and community psychiatry].

Authors:  S Weinmann; W Gaebel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  [Guideline conformity and outcome of inpatient treatment for schizophrenia. A clinical comparison].

Authors:  B Janssen; S Weinmann; M Berger; M Härter; T Held; M Leipert; H J Luderer; M Schwarz; T Steinert; W Gaebel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Inter-rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and the Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule in a European multi-site randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of acute psychiatric day hospitals.

Authors:  Matthias Schützwohl; Joanna Jarosz-Nowak; Jane Briscoe; Krzysztof Szajowski; Thomas Kallert
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.035

7.  The Met Needs Index: a new metric for outcome assessment in mental health services.

Authors:  Erik Wennström; Lars Berglund; Johan Lindbäck
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 8.  Involuntary vs. voluntary hospital admission. A systematic literature review on outcome diversity.

Authors:  Thomas W Kallert; Matthias Glöckner; Matthias Schützwohl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  A Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluate the Needs, Support, and Services for Common Mental Disorders: A Protocol Examining Two Community Extension Clinics.

Authors:  Varun S Mehta; Daya Ram
Journal:  Indian J Psychol Med       Date:  2020-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.