Literature DB >> 11515681

Stapled ileoanal pouches without loop ileostomy: a prospective study in 86 patients.

K Gullberg1, L Liljeqvist.   

Abstract

In restorative proctocolectomy the use of a stapling technique to construct an ileal pouch with anal anastomosis offers an alternative to the hand-sewn technique following mucosectomy; a temporary defunctioning loop ileostomy may reduce the consequences of an anastomotic leakage, however it may entail discomfort for the patient, an additional operation, possible complications, and longer total hospital stay. This prospective study evaluated the peri- and postoperative courses in 86 consecutive, referred patients receiving ileal pouch-anal anastomosis using the stapling technique to construct the ileal pouch and ileoanal anastomosis, omitting the defunctioning loop ileostomy except in cases of increased risk of ileoanal anastomotic insufficiency according to defined criteria. Follow-up time was 36-96 months. Patients undergoing primary loop ileostomy stayed a median of 19 days in hospital, as opposed to a median of 9 days in those who did not. Eight patients developed pelvic sepsis that demanded a secondary defunctioning loop ileostomy, and five showed symptoms arising from relapsing inflammation in residual rectal mucosa; in three of these, a secondary transanal mucosectomy covered by a loop ileostomy was necessary. During the follow-up period ten patients had bowel obstructions that demanded surgery; two developed late pouch-vaginal fistulas, and one a fistula from the J-limb to the abdominal scar. There was one case of pouch procidentia. At 12-month follow-up the median evacuation frequency was 6 per 24 h, the incidence of minor incontinence was about 10%, and urgency to evacuate occurred in about 10%. None of the patients experienced any major incontinence. The stapling technique and omission of the defunctioning loop ileostomy in restorative proctocolectomy were thus a comparatively reliable and time-saving method with short total hospital stay. In patients at increased risk of anastomotic complications, however, a defunctioning loop ileostomy is recommended. We believe it is important to perform an exact dissection into the anal canal to avoid a residual rectal mucosa that may be inflamed or even become dysplastic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11515681     DOI: 10.1007/s003840100289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  13 in total

1.  Laparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy.

Authors:  P Kienle; J Weitz; A Benner; C Herfarth; J Schmidt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Pouch-related dysplasia and adenocarcinoma following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  J W Um; A E M'Koma
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer: proctocolectomy and mucosectomy do not necessarily eliminate pouch-related cancer incidences.

Authors:  Amosy E M'Koma; Harold L Moses; Samuel E Adunyah
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis revisited.

Authors:  Alex Kartheuser; Pierre Stangherlin; Dimitri Brandt; Christophe Remue; Christine Sempoux
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Rod in loop ileostomy: just an insignificant detail for ileostomy-related complications?

Authors:  Marco Scarpa; Laura Sadocchi; Cesare Ruffolo; Maurizio Iacobone; Teresa Filosa; Daniela Prando; Lino Polese; Mauro Frego; Davide F D'Amico; Imerio Angriman
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Clinical results after restorative proctocolectomy without diverting ileostomy for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Hiroki Ikeuchi; Yasutsugu Shoji; Masato Kusunoki; Hidenori Yanagi; Masafumi Noda; Takehira Yamamura
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  In the beginning there was colectomy: current surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Daniel R McGrath; Allan D Spigelman
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  Does mesorectal preservation protect the ileoanal anastomosis after restorative proctocolectomy?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; Irina Radinski; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Clinical value of surveillance pouchoscopy in asymptomatic ileal pouch patients with underlying inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Hong Zhu; Xian-rui Wu; Elaine Queener; Ravi P Kiran; Feza H Remzi; Bo Shen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Effect of high-dose steroids on anastomotic complications after proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Lake; Eiman Firoozmand; Jung-Cheng Kang; Panteleimon Vassiliu; Linda S Chan; Petar Vukasin; Andreas M Kaiser; Robert W Beart
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.