Literature DB >> 11515397

Incremental lines of dental cementum in biological age estimation.

R Jankauskas1, S Barakauskas, R Bojarun.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of counting incremental lines of dental root cementum for biological age determination, and to compare it with alternative methods. Two samples were taken: 51 teeth from 49 individuals of known age obtained at the Stomatological Clinic, Vilnius University, as well as the canine teeth from the remains of 48 individuals from the mass graves of Tuskulenai in Vilnius (inhumed 1944-47). In the latter sample, the chronological age of 43 individuals was known through personal identification. Undecalcified teeth were sectioned with the Leica SP 1600 microtome diamond saw, and incremental line count as a blind test was made on sections of 35 to 100 microns thickness. Incremental line count was possible in 82-86 percent of cases. The results of three independent counts showed that intra-observer bias has no significant impact. Biological age was estimated by adding incremental line number to the average age of tooth eruption. It was found that mean absolute error was 6.46 years for the 1st sample, 6.27 years for the 2nd sample, and in some cases exceeded 10 years. For the 2nd sample, the results were compared to those of other methods such as endocranial suture ossification, pubic symphysis morphology and the "combined" method of Nemeskéri. All four methods yield a similar correlation in regard to an individual's chronological age. The highest correlation was found for the combined method, and the lowest one for public symphysis morphology. All correlations had a similar standard error. Thus our assessment is less enthusiastic than in some past studies; it is suggested that the incremental lines rather have a similar use as other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11515397     DOI: 10.1078/0018-442x-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Homo        ISSN: 0018-442X


  8 in total

1.  Age determination of adult individuals by three-dimensional modelling of canines.

Authors:  Delphine Tardivo; Julien Sastre; Jean-Hugues Catherine; Georges Leonetti; Pascal Adalian; Bruno Foti
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Age estimation using annulations in root cementum of human teeth: A comparison between longitudinal and cross sections.

Authors:  Kavya B Mallar; H C Girish; Sanjay Murgod; Bn Yathindra Kumar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

3.  Rib biomechanical properties exhibit diagnostic potential for accurate ageing in forensic investigations.

Authors:  Andrea Bonicelli; Bledar Xhemali; Elena F Kranioti; Peter Zioupos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Common methods of biological age estimation.

Authors:  Linpei Jia; Weiguang Zhang; Xiangmei Chen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Assessment of renal glomerulosclerosis and thickness of the carotid intima-media complex as a means of age estimation in Western European bodies.

Authors:  Carl Daniel Lehmann-Leo; Frank Ramsthaler; Christoph G Birngruber; Marcel A Verhoff
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 2.791

6.  Cemental annulation: An approach to age estimation in transverse and longitudinal sections using three different microscopes.

Authors:  Aishwarya Patil; B N V S Satish; Rony Tomy Kondody; Vishal Wali
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2022-06-28

7.  Estimation of age based on tooth cementum annulations: A comparative study using light, polarized, and phase contrast microscopy.

Authors:  Prabhpreet Kaur; Madhusudan Astekar; Jappreet Singh; Karandeep Singh Arora; Gagandeep Bhalla
Journal:  J Forensic Dent Sci       Date:  2015 Sep-Dec

8.  Parturitions, menopause and other physiological stressors are recorded in dental cementum microstructure.

Authors:  Paola Cerrito; Shara E Bailey; Bin Hu; Timothy G Bromage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.