Literature DB >> 11514955

Chromosomal imbalances in primary and metastatic melanomas revealed by comparative genomic hybridization.

M Balázs1, Z Adám, A Treszl, J Hunyadi, R Adány.   

Abstract

Characteristic genetic changes underlying the metastatic progression of malignant melanoma is incompletely understood. The goal of our study was to explore specific chromosomal alterations associated with the aggressive behavior of this neoplasm. Comparative genomic hybridization was performed to screen and compare genomic imbalances present in primary and metastatic melanomas. Sixteen primary and 12 metastatic specimens were analyzed. We found that the pattern of chromosomal aberrations is similar in the two subgroups; however, alterations present only in primary and/or metastatic tumors were also discovered. The mean number of genetic changes was 6.3 (range 1-14) in primary and 7.8 (range 1-16) in metastatic lesions. Frequent losses involved 9p and 10q, whereas gains most often occurred at 1q, 6p, 7q, and 8q. Distinct, high-level amplifications were mapped to 1p12-p21 and 1p22-p31 in both tumor types. Amplification of 4q12-q13.1, 7q21.3-qter and 8q23-qter were detected only in primary tumors. The 20q13-qter amplicon was present in a metastatic tumor. The number of genetic alterations were significantly higher in primary tumors which developed metastases within one year after the surgery compared to tumors without metastasis during this time period. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with centromeric and locus-specific probes was applied to validate CGH results on a subset of tumors. Comparison of FISH and CGH data gave good correlation. The aggressive behavior of melanoma is associated with accumulation of multiple genetic alterations. Chromosome regions, which differ in the primary and metastatic lesions, may represent potential targets to identify metastases-related chromosomal alterations. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11514955     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.1131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  17 in total

Review 1.  Chromosome 6p amplification and cancer progression.

Authors:  Gda C Santos; M Zielenska; M Prasad; J A Squire
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  The ectodomain shedding of E-cadherin by ADAM15 supports ErbB receptor activation.

Authors:  Abdo J Najy; Kathleen C Day; Mark L Day
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Superficial spreading and nodular melanoma are distinct biological entities: a challenge to the linear progression model.

Authors:  Holly S Greenwald; Erica B Friedman; Iman Osman
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 4.  CAS (CSE1L) signaling pathway in tumor progression and its potential as a biomarker and target for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Ming-Chung Jiang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-09-05

Review 5.  Chromosomal aberrations related to metastasis of human solid tumors.

Authors:  Lun-Xiu Qin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Through the looking glass and what you find there: making sense of comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization for melanoma diagnosis.

Authors:  Jayson Miedema; Aleodor A Andea
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 7.  Cancer stem cells and human malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Tobias Schatton; Markus H Frank
Journal:  Pigment Cell Melanoma Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.693

Review 8.  Stem cells in melanoma development.

Authors:  Marianna Sabatino; David F Stroncek; Harvey Klein; Francesco M Marincola; Ena Wang
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Distinct MHC gene expression patterns during progression of melanoma.

Authors:  Yan Degenhardt; Jia Huang; Joel Greshock; Galene Horiates; Katherine Nathanson; Xiaolu Yang; Meenhard Herlyn; Barbara Weber
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  [DNA copy number changes in the diagnosis of melanocytic tumors].

Authors:  J Bauer; B C Bastian
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.