Literature DB >> 11514768

Rates and odds ratios for complications in closed and open tibial fractures treated with unreamed, small diameter tibial nails: a multicenter analysis of 467 cases.

C Gaebler1, U Berger, P Schandelmaier, M Greitbauer, H H Schauwecker, B Applegate, G Zych, V Vécsei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A multicenter trial analyzed complications and odds for complications in open and closed tibial fractures stabilized by small diameter nails.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Four Level I trauma centers. PATIENTS: Four hundred sixty-seven tibial fractures were included in the study. There were fifty-two proximal fractures, 219 midshaft fractures, and 196 distal fractures. Breakdown into different AO/OTA groups showed 135 Type A fractures, 216 Type B fractures, and 116 Type C fractures. Two hundred sixty-five were closed fractures and 202 were open fractures. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and radiographic analysis.
METHODS: 467 patients' tibial fractures were stabilized with small diameter tibial nails using an unreamed technique. Indications for the use of small diameter tibial nails using an unreamed technique included all types of open or closed diaphyseal fractures. The operating surgeons decided whether or not to ream based on personal experience, fracture type, and soft-tissue damage. Surgeons of Center 1 preferred to treat AO Type A and B fractures with unreamed nails, and surgeons of Centers 2, 3, and 4 preferred to treat AO Type B and C fractures with unreamed nails. Closed and open fractures were treated in approximately the same ratio.
RESULTS: Analysis showed five (1.1 percent) deep infections (with a 5.4 percent rate of deep infections in Gustilo Grade III open fractures), forty-three delayed unions (9.2 percent), and twelve (2.6 percent) nonunions. Compartment syndromes occurred in sixty-two cases (13.3 percent), screw fatigue in forty-seven cases (10 percent), and fatigue failure of the tibial nail in three cases (0.6 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Fracture distraction of more than three millimeters should not be tolerated when stabilizing tibial fractures with unreamed, small-diameter nails as this increases the odds of having a delayed union by twelve times (p < 0.001) and a nonunion by four times (p = 0.057). There was a significant increase of complications in the group of Grade III open fractures (p < 0.001), AO/OTA Type C fractures (p = 0.002), and to a lesser extent in distal fractures. However, the rate of severe complications resulting in major morbidity was low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11514768     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200108000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of low, multidirectional locked nailing and plating in the treatment of distal tibial metadiaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Yong Li; Lei Liu; Xin Tang; Fuxing Pei; Guanglin Wang; Yue Fang; Hui Zhang; Nicolas Crook
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Critical analysis of tibial fracture healing following unreamed nailing.

Authors:  Khaled Hamed Salem
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Mechanobiology of fracture healing part 2 : Relevance for internal fixation of fractures].

Authors:  L Claes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Diaphyseal long bone nonunions - types, aetiology, economics, and treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Christoph Biehl; Matthäus Budak; Ulrich Thormann; Christian Heiss; Volker Alt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A Prospective Comparative Study of Reamed vs. Unreamed Nailing in Fractures Shaft of Tibia.

Authors:  Dinesh Choudary; B Kanthimathi
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2012-11

6.  The Gustilo-Anderson classification system as predictor of nonunion and infection in open tibia fractures.

Authors:  R V Thakore; E L Francois; S K Nwosu; B Attum; P S Whiting; M A Siuta; M A Benvenuti; A K Smith; M S Shen; I Mousavi; W T Obremskey; M K Sethi
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.693

7.  Exchange reamed nailing compared to augmentation compression plating leaving the inserted nail in situ in the treatment of aseptic tibial non-union: a two-centre study.

Authors:  Atesch Ateschrang; Georgios Karavalakis; Christoph Gonser; Ulrich Liener; Thomas Freude; Ulrich Stöckle; Matthias Walcher; Derek Zieker
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  [Treatment of hypertrophic non union of the distal tibial shaft with percutaneously inserted locking plate Initial report on experience in 4 cases].

Authors:  J Nolting; R Wirbel; A Seekamp; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 9.  Percutaneous grafting with bone marrow autologous concentrate for open tibia fractures: analysis of forty three cases and literature review.

Authors:  Louis-Romée Le Nail; Julien Stanovici; Joseph Fournier; Marie Splingard; Jorge Domenech; Philippe Rosset
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Immediate versus delayed intramedullary nailing for open fractures of the tibial shaft: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting deep infection and fracture healing.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Yokoyama; Moritoshi Itoman; Masataka Uchino; Kensuke Fukushima; Hiroshi Nitta; Yoshiaki Kojima
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.