D F Salisbury1, B Rutherford, M E Shenton, R W McCarley. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, McLean Hospital NBG-21, Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02178-9106, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scant and equivocal research exists examining the effects of button-pressing on P300. Button-pressing may decrease P300 latency and amplitude. The melding of motor potentials and P300 may also confound studies of P300 topography, such as studies of temporal scalp-area asymmetries in schizophrenia. METHOD: P300 was measured on button-press and silent-count tasks in control subjects. An estimate of motor activity was constructed from a simple reaction time task, with reaction times matched to the button-press task. The motor estimate was subtracted from the button-press P300 to assess Kok's (1988) additive model. Lastly, lateral P300 from schizophrenia patients was compared with each condition's P300. RESULTS: P300 was smaller and its topography different in the button-pressing task relative to silent-counting. The motor-correction procedure generated a P300 with normal topography. Comparison of the button-press P300 in controls to the silent-count P300 in schizophrenia patients reduced a significant lateral asymmetry to trend level. This asymmetry was significant after the correction procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Button-pressing generates smaller P300 than silent-counting. Also, P300 topography in button-pressing tasks is confounded by motor potentials. The distortion can be corrected with a motor potential estimate. Motor potentials can occlude differences in P300 topography between groups.
BACKGROUND: Scant and equivocal research exists examining the effects of button-pressing on P300. Button-pressing may decrease P300 latency and amplitude. The melding of motor potentials and P300 may also confound studies of P300 topography, such as studies of temporal scalp-area asymmetries in schizophrenia. METHOD:P300 was measured on button-press and silent-count tasks in control subjects. An estimate of motor activity was constructed from a simple reaction time task, with reaction times matched to the button-press task. The motor estimate was subtracted from the button-press P300 to assess Kok's (1988) additive model. Lastly, lateral P300 from schizophreniapatients was compared with each condition's P300. RESULTS:P300 was smaller and its topography different in the button-pressing task relative to silent-counting. The motor-correction procedure generated a P300 with normal topography. Comparison of the button-press P300 in controls to the silent-count P300 in schizophreniapatients reduced a significant lateral asymmetry to trend level. This asymmetry was significant after the correction procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Button-pressing generates smaller P300 than silent-counting. Also, P300 topography in button-pressing tasks is confounded by motor potentials. The distortion can be corrected with a motor potential estimate. Motor potentials can occlude differences in P300 topography between groups.
Authors: M E Shenton; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz; S D Pollak; M LeMay; C G Wible; H Hokama; J Martin; D Metcalf; M Coleman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1992-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Kathryn A Moores; C Richard Clark; Jo L M Hadfield; Greg C Brown; D James Taylor; Sean P Fitzgibbon; Andrew C Lewis; Darren L Weber; Richard Greenblatt Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Alexandra P Key; Samantha J Gustafson; Lindsey Rentmeester; Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Fred H Bess Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 2.297