Literature DB >> 11513156

Clearance of the cervical spine in multitrauma patients: the role of advanced imaging.

J R Crim1, K Moore, D Brodke.   

Abstract

The cervical spine is injured in 3% of major trauma patients. Radiographic clearance for injury must be provided efficiently and accurately. There are numerous choices for clearance that are now in clinical practice: lateral radiograph only, 3-view or 5-view cervical-spine (c-spine) series, flexion-extension radiographs, computed tomography (CT) with multiplanar reformations, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This article reviews the literature on methods of c-spine clearance, and emphasizes the pitfalls of each modality. Although lateral radiographs detect 60% to 80% of c-spine fractures, a significant number of fractures are not visible, even when three views of the spine are obtained. The sensitivity of plain radiographs can be improved by attention to several subtle features, which are discussed. Flexion-extension radiographs in the acute setting have an unacceptably high false-negative and false-positive rate. CT detects 97% to 100% of fractures, but its accuracy in detection of purely ligamentous injuries has not been documented. Furthermore, CT is limited in patients with severe degenerative disease. MRI is highly sensitive in the detection of ligamentous injury, but not all cases of injury may cause instability. MRI is also much less sensitive than CT to fractures of the posterior elements of the spine, and to injuries of the craniocervical junction. The causes of missed cervical spine injury and delayed instability are discussed and shown in this article. An algorithm for the use of advanced imaging is proposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11513156     DOI: 10.1016/s0887-2171(01)90023-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR        ISSN: 0887-2171            Impact factor:   1.875


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Shock trauma room management of spinal injuries in the framework of multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  A Woltmann; V Bühren
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm].

Authors:  B A Leidel; K-G Kanz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  CT of the musculoskeletal system: what is left is the days of MRI?

Authors:  A T H West; T J Marshall; P W Bearcroft
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation dose reduction using a neck detection algorithm for single spiral brain and cervical spine CT acquisition in the trauma setting.

Authors:  Nicholas D Ardley; Ken K Lau; Kevin Buchan
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-07-20

5.  Flexion and extension radiographic evaluation for the clearance of potential cervical spine injures in trauma patients.

Authors:  Bonnie McCracken; Eric Klineberg; Brian Pickard; David H Wisner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Factors associated with the use of cervical spine computed tomography imaging in pediatric trauma patients.

Authors:  Rebekah Mannix; Lise E Nigrovic; Sara A Schutzman; Kara Hennelly; Florence T Bourgeois; William P Meehan; Gary Fleisher; Michael Monuteaux; Lois K Lee
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 7.  Concomitant cervical fractures without neurological symptoms: a case report.

Authors:  F O F Reilly; A J C Gheiti; N Burke; M Timlin
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Evaluation of vertebral body fractures using susceptibility-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sarah M Böker; Lisa C Adams; Yvonne Y Bender; Moritz Wagner; Torsten Diekhoff; Eva Fallenberg; Bernd Hamm; Marcus R Makowski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Hidden discoligamentous instability in cervical spine injuries: can quantitative motion analysis improve detection?

Authors:  M Mayer; J Zenner; A Auffarth; M Blocher; M Figl; H Resch; H Koller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Trauma of the spine and spinal cord: imaging strategies.

Authors:  P M Parizel; T van der Zijden; S Gaudino; M Spaepen; M H J Voormolen; C Venstermans; F De Belder; L van den Hauwe; J Van Goethem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.