M M Cherrier1, M Mendez, K Perryman. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA. cherrier@u.washington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine performance on an objective measure of route learning in Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. BACKGROUND: Topographic disorientation (TD) is a common problem among AD patients. The underlying cognitive deficits that contribute to TD in AD patients are not well understood. METHOD: This study examined 19 healthy older individuals (controls) and 16 AD patients who were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery along with a novel Route Learning Test (RLT). Areas assessed included incidental learning, spatial relations. recall of the walking route, and recognition of landmarks. RESULTS: Despite comparable performance on basic visuospatial ability measures, AD patients performed significantly worse than controls on the RLT and evidenced poor incidental learning for environmental details. A measure of egocentric and allocentric orientation ability was the best predictor of RLT performance in AD patients. Among RLT subtests, AD patients performed best on recognition of landmarks compared with recognition and recall of spatial layout or recognition of incidental items in the environment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that poor performance on the RLT in AD patients is characteristic of poor spatial orientation or spatial reasoning. Therefore, episodes of TD in AD patients may occur secondary to poor spatial orientation.
OBJECTIVE: To examine performance on an objective measure of route learning in Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. BACKGROUND: Topographic disorientation (TD) is a common problem among ADpatients. The underlying cognitive deficits that contribute to TD in ADpatients are not well understood. METHOD: This study examined 19 healthy older individuals (controls) and 16 ADpatients who were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery along with a novel Route Learning Test (RLT). Areas assessed included incidental learning, spatial relations. recall of the walking route, and recognition of landmarks. RESULTS: Despite comparable performance on basic visuospatial ability measures, ADpatients performed significantly worse than controls on the RLT and evidenced poor incidental learning for environmental details. A measure of egocentric and allocentric orientation ability was the best predictor of RLT performance in ADpatients. Among RLT subtests, ADpatients performed best on recognition of landmarks compared with recognition and recall of spatial layout or recognition of incidental items in the environment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that poor performance on the RLT in ADpatients is characteristic of poor spatial orientation or spatial reasoning. Therefore, episodes of TD in ADpatients may occur secondary to poor spatial orientation.
Authors: Jessica L Hoffman; Sara Faccidomo; Michelle Kim; Seth M Taylor; Abigail E Agoglia; Ashley M May; Evan N Smith; L C Wong; Clyde W Hodge Journal: Int Rev Neurobiol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 3.230
Authors: Jakub Hort; Jan Laczó; Martin Vyhnálek; Martin Bojar; Jan Bures; Kamil Vlcek Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Amy E Sanders; Roee Holtzer; Richard B Lipton; Charles Hall; Joe Verghese Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 6.053