Literature DB >> 11512529

Outcomes after posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation in patients treated with adjunctive pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation.

B Bose1.   

Abstract

Fusion success and clinical outcome were determined in 48 high-risk patients who underwent posterolateral lumbar fusions with internal fixation and were treated with adjunctive pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation postoperatively. An independent radiographic assessment demonstrated a success rate of 97.9%. Following treatment, 59% of the working patients returned to their employment. Overall clinical assessment was excellent in 4.2% of patients, good in 79.2%, and fair in 16.7%; no patient had a poor clinical assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11512529     DOI: 10.1007/BF02850247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  9 in total

Review 1.  Electrical stimulation therapies for spinal fusions: current concepts.

Authors:  Jean C Gan; Paul A Glazer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical significance of different effects of static and pulsed electromagnetic fields on human osteoclast cultures.

Authors:  Simona Angela Barnaba; Laura Ruzzini; Alberto Di Martino; Angela Lanotte; Alessandro Sgambato; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 3.  Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: current knowledge.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in patients with sacroiliac joint pain following lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Dong-Young Cho; Myung-Hoon Shin; Jung-Woo Hur; Kyeong-Sik Ryu; Chun-Kun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-09-30

5.  Treatment of low back pain elicited by superior cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy after lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Naotaka Iwamoto; Toyohiko Isu; Kyongsong Kim; Yasuhiro Chiba; Daijiro Morimoto; Juntaro Matsumoto; Masanori Isobe
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

6.  Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation may improve fusion rates in cervical arthrodesis in high-risk populations.

Authors:  D Coric; D E Bullard; V V Patel; J T Ryaby; B L Atkinson; D He; R D Guyer
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  A Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Anthony J Lisi; Mickey Scheinowitz; Richard Saporito; Anthony Onorato
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2019-03-12

8.  Sacroiliac joint pain after multiple-segment lumbar fusion: a long-term observational study-Non-fused sacrum vs. fused sacrum.

Authors:  Eiki Unoki; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Eiji Abe; Takashi Kobayashi; Toshiki Abe; Yoichi Shimada
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-12-20

9.  Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulators Efficacy for Noninvasive Bone Growth in Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Brian Fiani; Athanasios Kondilis; Juliana Runnels; Preston Rippe; Cyrus Davati
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-06-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.