Literature DB >> 11511948

The oxygenation variations related to prone positioning during mechanical ventilation: a clinical comparison between ARDS and non-ARDS hypoxemic patients.

C Venet1, S Guyomarc'h, C Migeot, M Bertrand, P Gery, D Page, R Vermesch, J C Bertrand, F Zeni.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare, in clinical practice, the oxygenation variations related to prone positioning (PP) during mechanical ventilation in ARDS and non-ARDS hypoxemic patients. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective observational study of data on consecutive patients treated with the same protocol in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital. PATIENTS: From May 1996 to December 1998, 226 PP periods without adjunction of nitric oxide (NO) inhalation and/or almitrine bismesylate infusion, performed in 59 mechanically ventilated hypoxemic patients (arterial oxygen tension/fractional inspired oxygen (PaO2/FIO2) ratio <300 mmHg) with no evidence of left ventricular failure, were included in this study. MEASUREMENTS: Arterial blood gas was measured before the PP, at 1 h from the beginning of the PP, at the end of the PP and 1 h after returning to the supine position.
RESULTS: We analyzed 136 PP periods in 34 non-ARDS patients (60.2%) and 90 in 25 ARDS patients. The PP was repeated and the duration of the PP periods was: 10.6+/-0.22 h. The PP during the mechanical ventilation appeared to be safe and well tolerated. A PaO2/FIO2 ratio improvement at the end of the PP period, occurred for 196 periods (86.7%) with a mean PaO2/FIO2 ratio increase of +46.4+/-0.03% at the end of the PP periods compared to the baseline supine value. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio variations at 1 h after the start of the PP, at the end of the PP period and at 1 h after the return to supine were not different in ARDS or non-ARDS hypoxemic patients. The PaO2/FIO2 ratio improvement appeared to be more intense and more rapid in ARDS patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In about 90% of periods, PP improved the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with ARDS as well as in hypoxemic patients with non-ARDS. Studies are necessary to determine the impact of PP on survival and the mechanical ventilation duration in ARDS or non-ARDS hypoxemic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11511948     DOI: 10.1007/s001340101023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  3 in total

1.  Body position changes redistribute lung computed-tomographic density in patients with acute respiratory failure: impact and clinical fallout through the following 20 years.

Authors:  Luciano Gattinoni; Antonio Pesenti; Eleonora Carlesso
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Prognostic factors in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective multivariate analysis including prone positioning in management strategy.

Authors:  Christophe Venet; Stephane Guyomarc'h; Juliette Pingat; Christophe Michard; Silvy Laporte; Monique Bertrand; Pierre Gery; Dominique Page; Regine Vermesch; Jean Claude Bertrand; Fabrice Zeni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-20       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Prolonged Prone Positioning for COVID-19-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David B Page; Kadambari Vijaykumar; Derek W Russell; Sheetal Gandotra; Joe W Chiles; Micah R Whitson; Mark T Dransfield
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.