Literature DB >> 11511302

Change of ultraviolet absorbance of sunscreens by exposure to solar-simulated radiation.

H Maier1, G Schauberger, K Brunnhofer, H Hönigsmann.   

Abstract

Regarding the outdoor behavior of the Caucasian population, modern sunscreens should provide high and broad-spectrum ultraviolet protection in the ultraviolet B as well as in the ultraviolet A range and should be photochemically stable for ultraviolet doses, which can be expected in solar radiation. At present an assessment of the photostability of suncare products is not a general requirement before marketing. In order to evaluate the photostability of suncare products we conducted an in vitro test and measured the spectral absorbance of 16 sunscreens before, and after exposure to increasing biologically weighted standard erythema doses (5, 12.5, 25, 50) of solar-simulated radiation. Seven of 16 suncare products showed a significant dose- and wavelength-dependent decrease of the ultraviolet A protective capacity, whereas the ability to absorb ultraviolet B was not affected. In the ultraviolet A range, the decrease of absorbance (photoinactivation), respectively, the increase of transmission was 12-48% for an ultraviolet exposure of 25 standard erythema dose. Photoinactivation started in the wavelength range between 320 and 335 nm with a maximum above 350 nm. Furthermore, our analysis showed that the behavior of suncare products was not predictable from its individual ingredients. Neither complex combinations of organic filters nor addition of inorganic filters could absolutely prevent photoinactivation. The inclusion of a single photounstable filter did not mean photoinstability of the complete suncare product. Photoinactivation of sunscreens appears to be an underestimated hazard to the skin, first, by formation of free radicals, second, by increased ultraviolet A transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11511302     DOI: 10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01425.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invest Dermatol        ISSN: 0022-202X            Impact factor:   8.551


  9 in total

1.  Fluorescence dynamics of three UV-B sunscreens.

Authors:  Rajagopal Krishnan; Thomas M Nordlund
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 2.  [UV Filters. State of the art].

Authors:  P Wolf
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.751

3.  Natural Substances for Prevention of Skin Photoaging: Screening Systems in the Development of Sunscreen and Rejuvenation Cosmetics.

Authors:  Vladimir Kostyuk; Alla Potapovich; Ahmed R Albuhaydar; Wolfgang Mayer; Chiara De Luca; Liudmila Korkina
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.663

4.  Broad-spectrum sun-protective action of Porphyra-334 derived from Porphyra vietnamensis.

Authors:  Saurabh Bhatia; K Sharma; Ajay G Namdeo; B B Chaugule; M Kavale; S Nanda
Journal:  Pharmacognosy Res       Date:  2010-01

5.  Photostability of commercial sunscreens upon sun exposure and irradiation by ultraviolet lamps.

Authors:  Helena Gonzalez; Nils Tarras-Wahlberg; Birgitta Strömdahl; Asta Juzeniene; Johan Moan; Olle Larkö; Arne Rosén; Ann-Marie Wennberg
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2007-02-26

6.  Production of a Novel Mineral-based Sun Lotion for Protecting the Skin from Biohazards of Electromagnetic Radiation in the UV Region.

Authors:  M M Movahedi; A Alipour; S A R Mortazavi; M Tayebi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2014-03-08

7.  Molecular photoprotection of human keratinocytes in vitro by the naturally occurring mycosporine-like amino acid palythine.

Authors:  K P Lawrence; R Gacesa; P F Long; A R Young
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2018-03-25       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Octyl methoxycinnamate modulates gene expression and prevents cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation but not oxidative DNA damage in UV-exposed human cell lines.

Authors:  Nur Duale; Ann-Karin Olsen; Terje Christensen; Shamas T Butt; Gunnar Brunborg
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Suboptimal UVA attenuation by broad spectrum sunscreens under outdoor solar conditions contributes to lifetime UVA burden.

Authors:  Sergio G Coelho; Diego Rua; Sharon A Miller; Anant Agrawal
Journal:  Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.254

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.