Literature DB >> 11510788

Diagnosis of nosocomial pneumonia in medical ward: repeatability of the protected specimen brush.

B Herer1, C Fuhrman, D Demontrond, Z Gazevic, B Housset, C Chouaïd.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess the repeatability of two pairs of protected specimen brushes (PSB) done successively in the same lung area and either processed at the bedside or in the laboratory, and to provide a description of the bacteriological findings in 39 cases of suspected nosocomial pneumonia occurring in nonventilated patients. Four PSB were divided into two pairs. One pair of brushes (PB) was prepared at bedside and then sent to the laboratory; the other pair (PL) was immediately sent to the laboratory for complete processing. According to a 10(3) colony forming units (cfu) x mL(-1) threshold, 49% out of 156 PSB were positive. Using the 10(3) cfu x mL threshold, the PL brushes were 89.7% concordant while the PB brushes were 76.9% concordant. The repeatability as expressed by K-value of the cultures of PSB was higher for PL brushes than for PB brushes (K-values of 0.795 and 0.537 respectively, p=0.12). Bacterial species were isolated in 58.3% of 156 PSB (176 isolates). In 14 cases, cultures of PSB disclosed more than one micro-organism in a concentration > 10(3) cfu x mL(-1). The most frequently isolated organisms were Pseudomonas spp. (23.9%), Enterobacteriaceae (23.3%), Streptococcus spp. (21.6%) and Staphylococcus spp. (13.1%). Polymicrobial cultures were more frequent if the patient had a tracheostomy (seven out of the nine patients with a tracheostomy versus seven out of the 30 patients without a tracheostomy, p<0.01). Bacteriological discrepancies leading to a potential troublesome choice in antibiotherapy were observed in 31.8% of the patients for PL brushes and 56.5% of the patients for PB brushes. There is a low degree of repeatability of protected specimen brushes outside intensive care units which seem dependent on sampling processing. The distribution of pathogens found in case of suspicion of nosocomial pneumonia in nonventilated patients appears to be similar to that obtained in ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510788     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.01.99097901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and standard terminology regarding performance of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Philippe Michel; Evelyne Mouillet; L Rachid Salmi
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-04

2.  Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.

Authors:  Andre C Kalil; Mark L Metersky; Michael Klompas; John Muscedere; Daniel A Sweeney; Lucy B Palmer; Lena M Napolitano; Naomi P O'Grady; John G Bartlett; Jordi Carratalà; Ali A El Solh; Santiago Ewig; Paul D Fey; Thomas M File; Marcos I Restrepo; Jason A Roberts; Grant W Waterer; Peggy Cruse; Shandra L Knight; Jan L Brozek
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  The Diagnostic Yield of Noninvasive Microbiologic Sputum Sampling in a Cohort of Patients with Clinically Diagnosed Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia.

Authors:  Elliot L Naidus; Mary T Lasalvia; Edward R Marcantonio; Shoshana J Herzig
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Prediction of the pathogens that are the cause of pneumonia by the battlefield hypothesis.

Authors:  Takashi Hirama; Takefumi Yamaguchi; Hitoshi Miyazawa; Tomoaki Tanaka; Giichi Hashikita; Etsuko Kishi; Yoshimi Tachi; Shun Takahashi; Keiji Kodama; Hiroshi Egashira; Akemi Yokote; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Makoto Nagata; Toshiaki Ishii; Manabu Nemoto; Masahiko Tanaka; Koichi Fukunaga; Satoshi Morita; Minoru Kanazawa; Koichi Hagiwara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.