Literature DB >> 11510258

Changing the trend: a prospective study on factors contributing to the growth rate of peritoneal dialysis programs.

M F Gadallah1, G Ramdeen, C Torres-Rivera, M E Ibrahim, S Myrick, G Andrews, A Quin, C Fang, A Crossman.   

Abstract

Compared with countries worldwide, the United States currently has one of the lowest peritoneal dialysis (PD) populations as compared with its hemodialysis (HD) population. Approximately 12% of the total dialysis population in the United State is on PD. This figure correlates with the take-on rate [percentage of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients enrolling in PD programs] of about 12%-15% in the United States. Over a two-year period, we prospectively examined the role that developing a comprehensive infrastructure and support system had on expanding our PD program. The changes made included these: nephrologists placing PD catheters using the laparoscopic method; active identification of, and training for, family members and personnel in nursing homes and daycare centers to perform PD; improvements in home conditions through support by social workers; early ESRD patient education; and provision of in-center intermittent PD (IPD) for selected patients. We then compared the results from the two years after commencement of the changes against the two years before the changes were made. Training of personnel in nursing homes increased enrollment from 3 to 11 patients (p = 0.01); training of personnel in daycare centers increased enrollment from 0 to 5 patients (p = 0.05); training family members and providing family support increased enrollment from 4 to 15 patients (p = 0.03); early patient and family education increased enrollment from 4 to 24 patients (p = 0.008); improving home conditions increased enrollment from 1 to 14 patients (p = 0.01); and providing an IPD program for selected patients added 6 patients (p = 0.05). Introducing a program for nephrologists to place PD catheters by the laparoscopic technique decreased catheter mechanical failure (and subsequent transfer to HD), from 22 to 3 patients (p = 0.005). Our PD take-on rate (percentage of ESRD patients choosing PD modality) increased from 19% to 76% (p = 0.002). The total number of patients in the PD program over the two years after initiation of the changes increased from 33 to 93 (p = 0.01), while the number of HD patients decreased from 168 to 142 (p = 0.05). Developing a comprehensive infrastructure and support system for PD programs permits enrollment of patients who otherwise would have been excluded as PD candidates and eliminates loss of PD patients to HD. Implementation of such programs can contribute considerably to enhancing the PD population growth rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11510258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Perit Dial        ISSN: 1197-8554


  7 in total

1.  Training of surgeons in peritoneal dialysis catheter placement in the United States: a national survey.

Authors:  Leslie P Wong; Scott E Liebman; Katherine A Wakefield; Susan Messing
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Performance of procedures by nephrologists and nephrology fellows at U.S. nephrology training programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Berns; W Charles O'Neill
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Different outcomes of peritoneal catheter percutaneous placement by nephrologists using a trocar versus the Seldinger technique: the experience of two Brazilian centers.

Authors:  Daniela Ponce; Vanessa B Banin; Tricya Nunes Bueloni; Pasqual Barretti; Jacqueline Caramori; André Luís Balbi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Comparison of Percutaneous and Open Surgical Techniques for First-Time Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in the Unbreached Peritoneum.

Authors:  Samar Medani; Wael Hussein; Mohamed Shantier; Robert Flynn; Catherine Wall; George Mellotte
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Peritoneal dialysis in the nursing home.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Sharron Izatt; Chris Dalglish; Sarbjit Vanita Jassal; Joanne Bargman; Stephen Vas; Effie Tziviskou; Dimitrios Oreopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Patient education and care for peritoneal dialysis catheter placement: a quality improvement study.

Authors:  Leslie P Wong; Kalani T Yamamoto; Vijay Reddy; Denise Cobb; Alice Chamberlin; Hien Pham; Sumi J Sun; Madhavi Mallareddy; Miguel Saldivar
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  The choice of peritoneal dialysis catheter implantation technique by nephrologists.

Authors:  T Yip; S L Lui; W K Lo
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2013-01-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.