M K Ito1, G M Delucca, M A Aldridge. 1. Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) treatment guidelines, patients with preexisting coronary heart disease (CHD) or other atherosclerotic vascular disease should lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to < or = 100 mg/dL. Recent statin trials document the benefit of cholesterol lowering on CHD events but do not address the optimal goal of LDL cholesterol. METHODS: The pravastatin to simvastatin conversion-lipid optimization program (PSCOP) at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) was a formulary-conversion program designed to increase the percentage of patients who meet their recommended NCEP LDL cholesterol goal. We compared the incidence of clinical outcome and mortality between CHD patients from the original PSCOP cohort with postconversion LDL cholesterol greater than and < or = 100 mg/dL. A total of 524 patients were stratified by postconversion LDL cholesterol levels (greater than [N=183]) or < or = 100 mg/dL [N=341]) and observed for a mean duration of 27.7 months. Patients' VASDHS records were reviewed for postconversion mortality from any cause and CHD-related events. Patients were mailed a questionnaire to capture similar events that may have occurred outside of VASDHS, which might not be present in the patient's VASDHS record. RESULTS: Lipid-lowering therapy < or = 100 mg/dL was associated with a significantly lower percentage of total deaths and CHD-related events (40% vs 61%, P=0.008). In patients with LDL cholesterol >100 mg/dL, the relative risk of unstable angina (relative risk, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.8; P=0.004) and stroke (relative risk, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 8.6; P=0.04) were significantly greater compared to patients meeting their LDL cholesterol goal. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results support reducing LDL cholesterol to at least 100 mg/dL in the patient with CHD.
BACKGROUND: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) treatment guidelines, patients with preexisting coronary heart disease (CHD) or other atherosclerotic vascular disease should lower low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol to < or = 100 mg/dL. Recent statin trials document the benefit of cholesterol lowering on CHD events but do not address the optimal goal of LDL cholesterol. METHODS: The pravastatin to simvastatin conversion-lipid optimization program (PSCOP) at the VA San Diego Healthcare System (VASDHS) was a formulary-conversion program designed to increase the percentage of patients who meet their recommended NCEP LDL cholesterol goal. We compared the incidence of clinical outcome and mortality between CHD patients from the original PSCOP cohort with postconversion LDL cholesterol greater than and < or = 100 mg/dL. A total of 524 patients were stratified by postconversion LDL cholesterol levels (greater than [N=183]) or < or = 100 mg/dL [N=341]) and observed for a mean duration of 27.7 months. Patients' VASDHS records were reviewed for postconversion mortality from any cause and CHD-related events. Patients were mailed a questionnaire to capture similar events that may have occurred outside of VASDHS, which might not be present in the patient's VASDHS record. RESULTS:Lipid-lowering therapy < or = 100 mg/dL was associated with a significantly lower percentage of total deaths and CHD-related events (40% vs 61%, P=0.008). In patients with LDL cholesterol >100 mg/dL, the relative risk of unstable angina (relative risk, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.8; P=0.004) and stroke (relative risk, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 8.6; P=0.04) were significantly greater compared to patients meeting their LDL cholesterol goal. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results support reducing LDL cholesterol to at least 100 mg/dL in the patient with CHD.
Authors: Asa Carlsson; Fredrik Borgström; Jan Stålhammar; Evo Alemao; Don Yin; Linus Jönsson Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: E Van Ganse; T Souchet; L Laforest; P Moulin; M Bertrand; P Le Jeunne; N Travier; D Yin; E Alemao; G de Pouvourville Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Azan S Binbrek; Avishay Elis; Muayed Al-Zaibag; Jaan Eha; Irena Keber; Ada M Cuevas; Swati Mukherjee; Thomas R Miller Journal: Curr Ther Res Clin Exp Date: 2006-01