Literature DB >> 11509482

Pulse pressure compared with other blood pressure indexes in the prediction of 25-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality rates: The Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study.

K Miura1, A R Dyer, P Greenland, M L Daviglus, M Hill, K Liu, D B Garside, J Stamler.   

Abstract

We compared the relations of 4 blood pressure (BP) indexes (pulse pressure [PP], systolic BP [SBP], diastolic BP [DBP], and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) with 25-year mortality rates for coronary heart disease (CHD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), and all causes in younger, middle-aged, and older men and women by using data from a long-term prospective epidemiological study of employed persons who were screened between 1967 and 1973. A single supine BP measurement was obtained at baseline. Vital status was determined through 1995. We report on 5 groups (total, 28 360 participants) consisting of men age 18 to 39, 40 to 59, and 60 to 74 years and of women age 40 to 59 and 60 to 74 years who were not receiving antihypertensive treatment, had no history of CHD, and did not have diabetes. Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios with a 1-SD higher value for each BP index; Wald chi(2) tests were used to compare the strength of relations. Relations of PP were less strong than were those of SBP for all end points in all age/gender groups. SBP or MAP showed the strongest relations to all end points in all age/gender groups (hazard ratio, 1.17 to 1.36). The relations of SBP to death were stronger than were those of DBP, except for middle-aged men and for CVD in women. DBP showed significant positive associations with death, after control for SBP, in middle-aged participants. In conclusion, these data indicate that the long-term risk of high BP should be assessed mainly on the basis of SBP or of SBP and DBP together, not on the basis of PP, in apparently healthy adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11509482     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.38.2.232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  41 in total

Review 1.  Pulse pressure: an important tool in cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics.

Authors:  Roland Asmar; Michel Safar; Patrice Queneau
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Blood pressure and vascular calcification.

Authors:  Nicole E Jensky; Michael H Criqui; Michael C Wright; Christina L Wassel; Steven A Brody; Matthew A Allison
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Pulse pressure and adverse outcomes in women: a report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE).

Authors:  R David Anderson; B Clay Sizemore; Genevieve M Barrow; B Delia Johnson; C Noel Bairey Merz; George Sopko; Gregory O von Mering; Eileen M Handberg; Wilmer W Nichols; Carl J Pepine
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 2.689

Review 4.  The effects of exercise on cardiovascular outcomes before, during, and after treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen M Sturgeon; Bonnie Ky; Joseph R Libonati; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Pulse pressure is not an independent predictor of outcome in type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia--the Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT).

Authors:  S Theilade; B Claggett; T W Hansen; H Skali; E F Lewis; S D Solomon; H-H Parving; M Pfeffer; J J McMurray; P Rossing
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.012

6.  Treating blood pressure to prevent strokes: The age factor.

Authors:  Steven G Chrysant
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-26

Review 7.  Cardiac Remodeling, Adaptations and Associated Myocardial Mechanics in Hypertensive Heart Diseases.

Authors:  Yau-Huei Lai; Chi-In Lo; Yih-Jer Wu; Chung-Lieh Hung; Hung-I Yeh
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.672

8.  Significant Correlation between Brachial Pulse Pressure Index and Renal Resistive Index.

Authors:  Meng-Kuang Lee; Po-Chao Hsu; Chun-Yuan Chu; Wen-Hsien Lee; Szu-Chia Chen; Huang-Chi Chen; Ho-Ming Su; Tsung-Hsien Lin; Wen-Chol Voon; Wen-Ter Lai; Sheng-Hsiung Sheu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.672

9.  Differential influence of distinct components of increased blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes: from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  Susan Cheng; Deepak K Gupta; Brian Claggett; A Richey Sharrett; Amil M Shah; Hicham Skali; Madoka Takeuchi; Hanyu Ni; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 10.  Vascular abnormalities in hypertension: cause, effect, or therapeutic target?

Authors:  Gary E McVeigh; Rick Plumb; Sinead Hughes
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.