Literature DB >> 11509463

Promoting social responsibility for health: health impact assessment and healthy public policy at the community level.

M B Mittelmark1.   

Abstract

The 1997 Jakarta Declaration on Health Promotion into the 21st Century called for new responses to address the emerging threats to health. The declaration placed a high priority on promoting social responsibility for health, and it identified equity-focused health impact assessment as a high priority for action. This theme was among the foci at the 2000 Fifth Global Conference on Health Promotion held in Mexico. This paper, which is an abbreviation of a technical report prepared for the Mexico conference, advances arguments for focusing on health impact assessment at the local level. Health impact assessment identifies negative health impacts that call for policy responses, and identifies and encourages practices and policies that promote health. Health impact assessment may be highly technical and require sophisticated technology and expertise. But it can also be a simple, highly practical process, accessible to ordinary people, and one that helps a community come to grips with local circumstances that need changing for better health. To illustrate the possibilities, this paper presents a case study, the People Assessing Their Health (PATH) project from Eastern Nova Scotia, Canada. It places ordinary citizens, rather than community elites, at the very heart of local decision-making. Evidence from PATH demonstrates that low technology health impact assessment, done by and for local people, can shift thinking beyond the illness problems of individuals. It can bring into consideration, instead, how programmes and policies support or weaken community health, and illuminate a community's capacity to improve local circumstances for better health. This stands in contrast to evidence that highly technological approaches to community-level health impact assessment can be self-defeating. Further development of simple, people-centred, low technology approaches to health impact assessment at the local level is called for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11509463     DOI: 10.1093/heapro/16.3.269

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Int        ISSN: 0957-4824            Impact factor:   2.483


  10 in total

1.  Social responsibility of the hospitals in Isfahan city, Iran: Results from a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Mahmoud Keyvanara; Haniye Sadat Sajadi
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2015-02-12

2.  Growing the field of health impact assessment in the United States: an agenda for research and practice.

Authors:  Andrew L Dannenberg; Rajiv Bhatia; Brian L Cole; Carlos Dora; Jonathan E Fielding; Katherine Kraft; Diane McClymont-Peace; Jennifer Mindell; Chinwe Onyekere; James A Roberts; Catherine L Ross; Candace D Rutt; Alex Scott-Samuel; Hugh H Tilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Conceptualizing a quality plan for healthcare. A philosophical reflection on the relevance of the health profession to society.

Authors:  S Mehrdad Mohammadi; S Farzad Mohammadi; Jerris R Hedges
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  Sociocultural, environmental, and health challenges facing women and children living near the borders between Afghanistan, Iran, and Pakistan (AIP region).

Authors:  Iraj M Poureslami; David R MacLean; Jerry Spiegel; Annalee Yassi
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-09-20

5.  The role of urban municipal governments in reducing health inequities: A meta-narrative mapping analysis.

Authors:  Patricia A Collins; Michael V Hayes
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2010-05-25

6.  Staying connected: neighbourhood correlates of social participation among older adults living in an urban environment in Montréal, Quebec.

Authors:  Lucie Richard; Lise Gauvin; Céline Gosselin; Sophie Laforest
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Health impact assessment of free immunization program in Jinju City, Korea.

Authors:  Keon Yeop Kim; So Youn Jeon; Man Joong Jeon; Kwon Ho Lee; Sok Goo Lee; Dongjin Kim; Eunjeong Kang; Sang Geun Bae; Jinhee Kim
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-07-31

Review 8.  Screening for risky behaviour and mental health in young people: the YouthCHAT programme.

Authors:  Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Rhiannon Martel; Margot Darragh; Jim Warren; Hiran Thabrew; Terryann C Clark
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2017-10-13

9.  Advice and Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Citizen-Science Environmental Health Assessments.

Authors:  Timothy M Barzyk; Hongtai Huang; Ronald Williams; Amanda Kaufman; Jonathan Essoka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Framework for Participatory Quantitative Health Impact Assessment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Meelan Thondoo; Daniel H De Vries; David Rojas-Rueda; Yashila D Ramkalam; Ersilia Verlinghieri; Joyeeta Gupta; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.