Literature DB >> 11509398

ROC curve analysis of lesion detectability on phantoms: comparison of digital spot mammography with conventional spot mammography.

W M Yip1, S Y Pang, W S Yim, C S Kwok.   

Abstract

Although conventional screen--film mammography has excellent spatial resolution and is commonly used as a screening tool, certain inherent limitations prevent its further improvement. New digital mammography techniques, despite lower spatial resolution than screen--film mammography, may overcome these limitations. This study compared lesion detectability between charge coupled device-based digital spot mammography and conventional spot mammography. A total of 100 sets of images of specially designed breast phantoms was acquired, with variable background achieved by overlapping several layers of grapefruit fibre on a 4 cm thick lucite slab, using both modalities. 75 sets were "normal" images and 25 sets were images with simulated lesions. Four radiologists assessed the images according to a five-point confidence scale. The results were used to construct receiver operating characteristic curves. No statistical difference was observed between the two sets of curves for individual radiologists as well as pooled data. The lower spatial resolution of digital mammography was compensated for by its higher contrast sensitivity relative to conventional spot mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11509398     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.74.883.740621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of human observer performance of contrast-detail detection across multiple liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Alice N Averbukh; David S Channin; Prasobsook Homhual
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system.

Authors:  Toyohiko Tanaka; Norihisa Nitta; Shinichi Ohta; Tsuyoshi Kobayashi; Akiko Kano; Keiko Tsuchiya; Yoko Murakami; Sawako Kitahara; Makoto Wakamiya; Akira Furukawa; Masashi Takahashi; Kiyoshi Murata
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Image quality of digital direct flat-panel mammography versus an indirect small-field CCD technique using a high-contrast phantom.

Authors:  Kathrin Barbara Krug; Hartmut Stützer; Peter Frommolt; Julia Boecker; Henning Bovenschulte; Volker Sendler; Klaus Lackner
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-10-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.