Literature DB >> 11508980

Melody lead in piano performance: expressive device or artifact?

W Goebl1.   

Abstract

As reported in the recent literature on piano performance, an emphasized voice (the melody) tends to be played not only louder than the other voices, but also about 30 ms earlier (melody lead). It remains unclear whether pianists deliberately apply melody lead to separate different voices, or whether it occurs because the melody is played louder (velocity artifact). The velocity artifact explanation implies that pianists initially strike the keys simultaneously; it is only different velocities that make the hammers arrive at different points in time. The measured note onsets in these studies, mostly derived from computer-monitored pianos, represent the hammer-string impact times. In the present study, the finger-key contact times are calculated and analyzed as well. If the velocity artifact hypothesis is correct, the melody lead phenomenon should disappear at the finger-key level. Chopin's Ballade op. 38 (45 measures) and Etude op. 10/3 (21 measures) were performed on a Bösendorfer computer-monitored grand piano by 22 skilled pianists. The hammer-string asynchronies among voices closely resemble the results reported in the literature. However, the melody lead decreases almost to zero at the finger-key level, which supports the velocity artifact hypothesis. In addition to this, expected onset asynchronies are predicted from differences in hammer velocity, if finger-key asynchronies are assumed to be zero. They correlate highly with the observed melody lead.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508980     DOI: 10.1121/1.1376133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance.

Authors:  Werner Goebl; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Continuation tapping to triggered melodies: motor resonance effects of melodic motion.

Authors:  Paolo Ammirante; William F Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Exhausting repetitive piano tasks lead to local forearm manifestation of muscle fatigue and negatively affect musical parameters.

Authors:  Etienne Goubault; Felipe Verdugo; Justine Pelletier; Caroline Traube; Mickaël Begon; Fabien Dal Maso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Individuality in harpsichord performance: disentangling performer- and piece-specific influences on interpretive choices.

Authors:  Bruno Gingras; Pierre-Yves Asselin; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-28

5.  Investigating pianists' individuality in the performance of five timbral nuances through patterns of articulation, touch, dynamics, and pedaling.

Authors:  Michel Bernays; Caroline Traube
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-04

6.  On the One Hand or on the Other: Trade-Off in Timing Precision in Bimanual Musical Scale Playing.

Authors:  Floris Tijmen van Vugt; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2019-09-03

7.  An evaluation of linear and non-linear models of expressive dynamics in classical piano and symphonic music.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Cancino-Chacón; Thassilo Gadermaier; Gerhard Widmer; Maarten Grachten
Journal:  Mach Learn       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.940

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.