Literature DB >> 11508685

Comparison of quality of life and nutritional parameters after total gastrectomy and a new type of pouch construction with simple Roux-en-Y reconstruction: preliminary results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

K Kalmár1, L Cseke, K Zámbó, O P Horváth.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to introduce a new type of gastric substitute, the aboral pouch, after total gastrectomy and to compare nutritional, motility, and quality of life parameters of patients with an aboral pouch to those undergoing simple Roux-en-Y reconstruction in a prospective, randomized, and controlled trial. To date 40 patients have entered the study. In 22 of them the aboral pouch was created; the remaining 18 patients with simple Roux-en-Y reconstruction served as the control group. Laboratory measurements, passage studies, lipid and carbohydrate absorption tests, and quality of life interviews were carried out as follow-up examinations. Preliminary results suggest that the aboral pouch has some advantages over simple Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Serum immunoglobulin M level and the quality of life estimated by the gastrointestinal quality of life index, yielded significantly better results in the pouch group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11508685     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010634427766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  25 in total

1.  Construction of food pouch from segment of jejunum as substitute for stomach in total gastrectomy.

Authors:  C J HUNT
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1952-05

2.  Replacing stomach after total gastrectomy with right ileocolon.

Authors:  A J HUNNICUTT
Journal:  AMA Arch Surg       Date:  1952-07

3.  Gastric substitute after total gastrectomy--clinical relevance for reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  A Schwarz; H G Beger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Long-term beneficial effects of a gastric reservoir on weight control after total gastrectomy: a study of potential mechanisms.

Authors:  B Liedman; I Bosaeus; I Hugosson; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Bacterial overgrowth, intestinal transit, and nutrition after total gastrectomy. Comparison of a jejunal pouch with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in a prospective random study.

Authors:  M K Iivonen; T O Ahola; M J Matikainen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Pouch versus esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  H Troidl; J Kusche; K H Vestweber; E Eypasch; U Maul
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Reconstruction of the food passage after total gastrectomy: randomized trial.

Authors:  K H Fuchs; A Thiede; R Engemann; E Deltz; O Stremme; H Hamelmann
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Importance of the duodenal passage and pouch volume after total gastrectomy and reconstruction with the Ulm pouch: prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  A Schwarz; M Büchler; K Usinger; H Rieger; B Glasbrenner; H Friess; R Kunz; H G Beger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Food intake after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: the role of a gastric reservoir.

Authors:  B Liedman; H Andersson; B Berglund; I Bosaeus; I Hugosson; L Olbe; L Lundell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  [Quality of life after prograde jejunum interposition with and without pouch. A prospective study of stomach cancer patients on the reservoir as a reconstruction principle after total gastrectomy].

Authors:  R Schmitz; K H Moser; J Treckmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 0.955

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparing aboral versus oral pouch with preserved duodenal passage after total gastrectomy: does the position of the gastric substitute reservoir count?

Authors:  Katalin Kalmár; Zsolt Káposztás; Gábor Varga; László Cseke; András Papp; Ors Péter Horváth
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 2.  Quality of life in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ad-A Kaptein; Satoshi Morita; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Pouch size influences clinical outcome of pouch construction after total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Heng-Lei Dong; Yu-Bei Huang; Xue-Wei Ding; Feng-Ju Song; Ke-Xin Chen; Xi-Shan Hao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Optimal size of jejunal pouch as a reservoir after total gastrectomy: a single-center prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Naoko Sakamoto; Takashi Ichikura; Shuichi Hiraki; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Isao Kumano; Yusuke Matsumoto; Kazumichi Yoshida; Satoshi Ono; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Worldwide practice in gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Hylke J F Brenkman; Leonie Haverkamp; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Postprandial gastrointestinal hormone production is different, depending on the type of reconstruction following total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Katalin Kalmár; József Németh; Dezso Kelemen; Agoston Kelemen; Ember Agoston; Ors Péter Horváth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Pouch Roux-en-Y vs No Pouch Roux-en-Y following total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 12 studies.

Authors:  Liang Zong; Ping Chen; Yinbing Chen; Guohao Shi
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2011-03

8.  Intracorporeal bi-directional pouch jejunojejunostomy following Roux-en-Y anastomosis: a simple reconstruction technique using an endoscopic linear stapler.

Authors:  Amy Kim; Chang Seok Ko; Byung Sik Kim; Hee Sung Kim
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.