Literature DB >> 11507923

Laboratory evaluation of anti-biofilm agents for use in dental unit waterlines.

T F Meiller1, J I Kelley, A A Baqui, L G DePaola.   

Abstract

Dental unit waterline biofilm has been recognized as a potential point of contamination and a risk to patients with any level of immunocompromise. Biofilm in dental unit waterlines, once established, has proven formidable to efforts in disinfection/disruption. This project compared standardized evaluation techniques by assessing the efficacy of a variety of agents that have been reported or suggested as useful in surface disinfection and/or antiseptic protocols. The zones of inhibition, minimum inhibitory/bactericidal concentrations and use-dilution with stainless steel carrier replicates tests assessed the disinfection of planktonic organisms using standardized microbial testing procedures. The disruption and/or disinfection of planktonic and biofilm organisms within naturally occurring dental unit waterlines were evaluated by culture and scanning electron microscopy. The six commercially available antimicrobial agents used to assess the techniques were bleach (sodium hypochlorite), Cavicide, glutaraldehyde, Listerine Antiseptic, Peridex and Sterilex Ultra. Comparisons between the results for each technique evaluated were determined for each product. All six agents demonstrated antimicrobial efficacy at the working concentrations designated by the manufacturers. Biofilm matrix elimination evaluated by scanning electron microscopy found virtually 0% elimination by glutaraldehyde to an estimated 90% elimination by Sterilex Ultra and bleach after one treatment. Treatment with Cavicide, Listerine Antiseptic and Peridex resulted in negligible elimination of the biofilm matrix. For comparability, the use of standardized testing techniques to evaluate a disinfection agent's efficacy against dental unit waterline contamination is essential. This project demonstrates a model system for evaluating disinfection agents potentially useful in the management of dental unit waterline biofilm, and should assist in educating the dental clinician in the appraisal of existing and future product claims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11507923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Dent        ISSN: 0895-8831


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the efficacies of disinfectants to control microbial contamination in dental unit water systems in general dental practices across the European Union.

Authors:  A J Schel; P D Marsh; D J Bradshaw; M Finney; M R Fulford; E Frandsen; E Østergaard; J M ten Cate; W R Moorer; A Mavridou; J J Kamma; G Mandilara; L Stösser; S Kneist; R Araujo; N Contreras; P Goroncy-Bermes; D O'Mullane; F Burke; P O'Reilly; G Hourigan; M O'Sullivan; R Holman; J T Walker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of biocides on biofilm bacteria from dental unit water lines.

Authors:  I Liaqat; A N Sabri
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  A new chemical formulation for control of dental unit water line contamination: An 'in vitro' and clinical 'study'

Authors:  Lucio Montebugnoli; Giovanni Dolci
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Effect of 0.2% chlorhexidine on microbial and fungal contamination of dental unit waterlines.

Authors:  Raha Habib Agahi; Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour; Mahsa Kalantari; Amin Ayatollah-Mosavi; Hossein Aghassi; Amir Hossein Gandjalikhan Nassab
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.