Literature DB >> 11507341

Keratoprosthesis: an update.

B Khan1, E J Dudenhoefer, C H Dohlman.   

Abstract

Porous polytetrafluoroethylene and polyurethane skirt materials, as well as copolymers of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), have shown promise in approaching the goal of a "biointegratable" keratoprosthesis. A novel fixation method that uses scleral haptics also has been introduced to increase stability. An all silicone device that can be sewn into position has been used successfully, temporarily, during vitreoretinal procedures. The prognosis of keratoprosthesis (KPro) procedures depends on the preoperative diagnosis: graft failure-noncicatrizing disease>ocular cicatricial pemphigoid>chemical burns>Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The likelihood of endophthalmitis after KPro surgery follows this scheme. Causative organisms tend to be gram-positive. Modified vitreoretinal techniques also have been developed, allowing successful treatment of posterior segment complications. The science of keratoprosthesis is advancing more rapidly than in previous years. However, use of KPro to address complicated corneal blindness worldwide remains limited. The authors conducted an English language literature review from January 1, 2000 to April 1, 2001 and describe advances of note in the field of keratoprosthesis design, materials, and medical and surgical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11507341     DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200108000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  17 in total

Review 1.  Development of hydrogel-based keratoprostheses: a materials perspective.

Authors:  David Myung; Pierre-Emile Duhamel; Jennifer R Cochran; Jaan Noolandi; Christopher N Ta; Curtis W Frank
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2008-04-19

2.  Evaluation of immersion 20 MHz B-scan ultrasonography in observing lens in the alkali burn eyes.

Authors:  Qing-Hua Yang; Bing Chen; Li-Qiang Wang; Guang-Hua Peng; Zhao-Hui Li; Yi-Fei Huang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Long-term follow-up of a supradescemetic keratoprosthesis in rabbits: an immunofluorescence study.

Authors:  Edgar M Espana; Ana C Acosta; Josef Stoiber; Viviana Fernandez; Peggy D Lamar; Franck L Villain; Emmanuel Lacombe; Eduardo Alfonso; Jean-Marie Parel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Five year follow up of biocolonisable microporous fluorocarbon haptic (BIOKOP) keratoprosthesis implantation in patients with high risk of corneal graft failure.

Authors:  J L Alió; M E Mulet; H Haroun; J Merayo; J M Ruiz Moreno
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results.

Authors:  Joseph B Ciolino; Michael W Belin; Amit Todani; Khalid Al-Arfaj; Christopher J Rudnisky
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  High-resolution spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography in type 1 Boston keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  Brett L Shapiro; Dennis E Cortés; Eric K Chin; Jennifer Y Li; John S Werner; Ellen Redenbo; Mark J Mannis
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Corneal graft dellen in a patient implanted with a Boston keratoprosthesis type 1.

Authors:  Riccardo Scotto; Aldo Vagge; Carlo E Traverso
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.031

8.  Bioactive interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels that support corneal epithelial wound healing.

Authors:  David Myung; Nabeel Farooqui; Luo Luo Zheng; Wongun Koh; Sarita Gupta; Amit Bakri; Jaan Noolandi; Jennifer R Cochran; Curtis W Frank; Christopher N Ta
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.396

9.  Protein, cell and bacterial response to atmospheric pressure plasma grafted hyaluronic acid on poly(methylmethacrylate).

Authors:  Raechelle A D'Sa; Jog Raj; Peter J Dickinson; M Ann S McMahon; David A McDowell; Brian J Meenan
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Future perspectives for regenerative medicine in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Jennifer Elisseeff; Marcos G Madrid; Qiaozhi Lu; J Jeremy Chae; Qiongyu Guo
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.