Literature DB >> 11507113

Seasonal variation in energy expenditure, water flux and food consumption of Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx.

J B Williams1, S Ostrowski, E Bedin, K Ismail.   

Abstract

We report on the energy expenditure and water flux, measured in the laboratory and in the field, of the Arabian oryx Oryx leucoryx, the largest desert ruminant for which measurements of the field metabolic rate of free-living individuals have been made using doubly labeled water. Prior to extirpation of this species in the wild in 1972, conservationists sequestered a number of individuals for captive breeding; in 1989, oryx were reintroduced in Saudi Arabia into Mahazat as-Sayd (2244 km(2)). Apart from small pools of water available after rains, oryx do not have free-standing water available for drinking and therefore rely on grasses that they eat for preformed water intake as well as their energy needs. We tested whether oryx have a reduced fasting metabolic rate and total evaporative water loss (TEWL) in the laboratory, as do some other arid-adapted mammals, and whether oryx have high field metabolic rates (FMRs) and water influx rates (WIRs), as predicted by allometric equations for large arid-zone mammals. We measured FMR and WIR during the hot summer, when plant moisture content was low and ambient temperatures were high, and after winter rains, when the water content of grasses was high. For captive oryx that weighed 84.1 kg, fasting metabolic rate averaged 8980 kJ day(-1), 16.7% lower than predictions for Artiodactyla. Our own re-analysis of minimal metabolic rates among Artiodactyla yielded the equation: logV(O2)=-0.153+0.758logM, where V(O2) is the rate of oxygen uptake in lh(-1) and M is body mass in kg. Fasting metabolic rate of oryx was only 9.1% lower than predicted, suggesting that they do not have an unusually low metabolic rate. TEWL averaged 870.0 ml day(-1), 63.9% lower than predicted, a remarkably low value even compared with the camel, but the mechanisms that contribute to such low rates of water loss remain unresolved. For free-living oryx, FMR was 11076 kJ day(-1) for animals with a mean body mass of 81.5 kg during summer, whereas it was 22081 kJ day(-1) for oryx in spring with a mean body mass of 89.0 kg, values that were 48.6% and 90.4% of allometric predictions, respectively. During summer, WIR averaged 1310 ml H(2)O day(-1), whereas in spring it was 3438 ml H(2)O day(-1). Compared with allometric predictions, WIR was 76.9% lower than expected in summer and 43.6% lower in spring. We found no evidence to support the view that the WIR of large desert ungulates is higher than that of their mesic counterparts. On the basis of the WIR of the oryx averaged over the year and the water contents of plants in their diet, we estimated that an oryx consumes 858 kg of dry matter per year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11507113     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.13.2301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  11 in total

1.  The effects of shade on performance, carcass classes and behaviour of heat-stressed feedlot cattle at the finisher phase.

Authors:  K L Blaine; Ignatius Verla Nsahlai
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Variation in the daily rhythm of body temperature of free-living Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx): does water limitation drive heterothermy?

Authors:  Robyn Sheila Hetem; Willem Maartin Strauss; Linda Gayle Fick; Shane Kevin Maloney; Leith Carl Rodney Meyer; Mohammed Shobrak; Andrea Fuller; Duncan Mitchell
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Metabolic and Kidney Diseases in the Setting of Climate Change, Water Shortage, and Survival Factors.

Authors:  Richard J Johnson; Peter Stenvinkel; Thomas Jensen; Miguel A Lanaspa; Carlos Roncal; Zhilin Song; Lise Bankir; Laura G Sánchez-Lozada
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Physiological acclimation of a desert antelope, Arabian oryx (Oryx leucoryx), to long-term food and water restriction.

Authors:  Stéphane Ostrowski; Joseph B Williams; Pascal Mésochina; Helga Sauerwein
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.200

5.  Climate change and animals in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Joseph B Williams; Mohammed Shobrak; Thomas M Wilms; Ibrahim A Arif; Haseeb A Khan
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Seasonal changes in energy expenditure, body temperature and activity patterns in llamas (Lama glama).

Authors:  Alexander Riek; Lea Brinkmann; Matthias Gauly; Jurcevic Perica; Thomas Ruf; Walter Arnold; Catherine Hambly; John R Speakman; Martina Gerken
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The grey mouse lemur uses season-dependent fat or protein sparing strategies to face chronic food restriction.

Authors:  Sylvain Giroud; Martine Perret; Peter Stein; Joëlle Goudable; Fabienne Aujard; Caroline Gilbert; Jean Patrice Robin; Yvon Le Maho; Alexandre Zahariev; Stéphane Blanc; Iman Momken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Determinants of heart rate in Svalbard reindeer reveal mechanisms of seasonal energy management.

Authors:  L Monica Trondrud; Gabriel Pigeon; Steve Albon; Walter Arnold; Alina L Evans; R Justin Irvine; Elżbieta Król; Erik Ropstad; Audun Stien; Vebjørn Veiberg; John R Speakman; Leif Egil Loe
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  An Ecological Paradox: The African Wild Dog (Lycaon Pictus) Is Not Attracted to Water Points When Water Is Scarce in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Henry Ndaimani; Paradzayi Tagwireyi; Lovelater Sebele; Hillary Madzikanda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Living on the edge: Daily, seasonal and annual body temperature patterns of Arabian oryx in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  S Streicher; H Lutermann; N C Bennett; M F Bertelsen; O B Mohammed; P R Manger; M Scantlebury; K Ismael; A N Alagaili
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.