P K Tulikangas1, M R Piedmonte, A M Weber. 1. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. tulikap@ccf.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the functional and anatomic outcomes in women who have surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with enterocele repair. METHODS: Fifty-four women had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse which included enterocele repair. Preoperative and postoperative examinations were done by a research nurse, including a pelvic examination using the International Continence Society staging system and standardized questionnaires about bowel function, sexual function, and prolapse symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty-four women had enterocele repairs as part of their surgery. Mean follow-up time was 16 months (range 6-29 months). Postoperatively five women were excluded from the analysis because of fluctuation in stage of prolapse over time. At the apex and posterior wall of the vagina, 33 women had stage 0 or I prolapse, and 16 had stage II prolapse. None had stage III or IV prolapse. Fifty-three percent of women had improvement in bowel function and 91% had improvement in vaginal prolapse symptoms. Functional outcomes were not significantly different in women with and without stage II prolapse at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Most women who had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with enterocele repair reported improvement in vaginal prolapse symptoms. Functional outcomes did not differ significantly between women with stage 0 and I prolapse and women with stage II prolapse at the vaginal apex and posterior vaginal wall. This was an observational study and the lack of statistically significant findings could result from inadequate sample size; however, the observed differences were judged to be not clinically significant.
OBJECTIVE: To identify the functional and anatomic outcomes in women who have surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with enterocele repair. METHODS: Fifty-four women had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse which included enterocele repair. Preoperative and postoperative examinations were done by a research nurse, including a pelvic examination using the International Continence Society staging system and standardized questionnaires about bowel function, sexual function, and prolapse symptoms. RESULTS: Fifty-four women had enterocele repairs as part of their surgery. Mean follow-up time was 16 months (range 6-29 months). Postoperatively five women were excluded from the analysis because of fluctuation in stage of prolapse over time. At the apex and posterior wall of the vagina, 33 women had stage 0 or I prolapse, and 16 had stage II prolapse. None had stage III or IV prolapse. Fifty-three percent of women had improvement in bowel function and 91% had improvement in vaginal prolapse symptoms. Functional outcomes were not significantly different in women with and without stage II prolapse at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Most women who had surgery for pelvic organ prolapse with enterocele repair reported improvement in vaginal prolapse symptoms. Functional outcomes did not differ significantly between women with stage 0 and I prolapse and women with stage II prolapse at the vaginal apex and posterior vaginal wall. This was an observational study and the lack of statistically significant findings could result from inadequate sample size; however, the observed differences were judged to be not clinically significant.