BACKGROUND: Although ether, alcohol, and halogenated alkane anesthetics potentiate agonist actions or increase the apparent agonist affinity of ligand-gated ion channels at clinically relevant concentrations, the effects of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels have not been studied. The current study assessed the abilities of two representative nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics (cyclopropane and butane) to potentiate agonist actions or increase the apparent agonist affinity of two representative ligand-gated ion channels: the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and y-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor. METHODS: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors were obtained from the electroplax organ of Torpedo nobiliana, and human GABA(A) receptors (alpha1beta2gamma2L) were expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. The Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptors apparent agonist affinity in the presence and absence of anesthetic was assessed by measuring the apparent rates of desensitization induced by a range of acetylcholine concentrations. The GABA(A) receptor's apparent agonist affinity in the presence and absence of anesthetic was assessed by measuring the peak currents induced by a range of GABA concentrations. RESULTS: Neither cyclopropane nor butane potentiated agonist actions or increased the apparent agonist affinity (reduced the apparent agonist dissociation constant) of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor or GABA(A) receptor. At clinically relevant concentrations, cyclopropane and butane reduced the apparent rate of Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization induced by low concentrations of agonist. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the in vivo central nervous system depressant effects of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics do not result from their abilities to potentiate agonist actions on ligand-gated ion channels. Other targets or mechanisms more likely account for the anesthetic activities of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics.
BACKGROUND: Although ether, alcohol, and halogenated alkane anesthetics potentiate agonist actions or increase the apparent agonist affinity of ligand-gated ion channels at clinically relevant concentrations, the effects of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics on ligand-gated ion channels have not been studied. The current study assessed the abilities of two representative nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics (cyclopropane and butane) to potentiate agonist actions or increase the apparent agonist affinity of two representative ligand-gated ion channels: the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and y-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA(A)) receptor. METHODS: Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors were obtained from the electroplax organ of Torpedo nobiliana, and humanGABA(A) receptors (alpha1beta2gamma2L) were expressed in humanembryonic kidney 293 cells. The Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptors apparent agonist affinity in the presence and absence of anesthetic was assessed by measuring the apparent rates of desensitization induced by a range of acetylcholine concentrations. The GABA(A) receptor's apparent agonist affinity in the presence and absence of anesthetic was assessed by measuring the peak currents induced by a range of GABA concentrations. RESULTS: Neither cyclopropane nor butane potentiated agonist actions or increased the apparent agonist affinity (reduced the apparent agonist dissociation constant) of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor or GABA(A) receptor. At clinically relevant concentrations, cyclopropane and butane reduced the apparent rate of Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization induced by low concentrations of agonist. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the in vivo central nervous system depressant effects of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics do not result from their abilities to potentiate agonist actions on ligand-gated ion channels. Other targets or mechanisms more likely account for the anesthetic activities of nonhalogenated alkane anesthetics.
Authors: Lana J Mawhinney; Juan Pablo de Rivero Vaccari; Ofelia F Alonso; Christopher A Jimenez; Concepción Furones; W Javier Moreno; Michael C Lewis; W Dalton Dietrich; Helen M Bramlett Journal: Brain Res Date: 2011-11-07 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Daya I Perkins; James R Trudell; Daniel K Crawford; Ronald L Alkana; Daryl L Davies Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 12.310