Literature DB >> 1150592

Oxygen uptake/heart rate relationship in leg and arm exercise, sitting and standing.

Z Vokac, H Bell, E Bautz-Holter, K Rodahl.   

Abstract

The effect of leg exercise and of arm exercise in sitting and standing body positions on energy output and on some cardiorespiratory parameters was studied in seven male subjects. Oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (fH), pulmonary ventilation (VE) and respiratory frequency were measured at rest, in the 7-8th min of submaximal work (300, 600, 900 kpm/min), and at maximal effort. Significantly higher Vo2, fH, and VE in arm cranking than in cycling were found at submaximal work loads above 300 kpm/min. Though the maximal work load in arm exercise was 50-60% of that in cycling, Vo2 in arm work was at maximal effort only 22% lower than in leg exercise while the difference in fH was insignificant. No differences were found in arm work between the results obtained at any work level in sitting and standing body positions. The only postural difference in arm work was a 13% higher work load achieved at maximal effort when standing than when sitting. Differences in fH between arm and leg exercise were much smaller for the same Vo2 than for the same work load and were time dependent. While fH quickly leveled off in leg exercise, fH in arm cranking rose steadily during the first 6 min of work which created the fH differences observed in the 7-8 min of submaximal arm arm and leg exercise. At submaximal work levels a tendency to synchronize the respiratory frequency with the frequency of the rotatory movements was more apparent in arm cranking than in cycling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1150592     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1975.39.1.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 0021-8987            Impact factor:   3.531


  24 in total

1.  Effect of arm-shoulder fatigue on carpenters at work.

Authors:  E Hammarskjöld; K Harms-Ringdahl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

2.  Comparisons of physiological and perceptual responses in healthy men and women during standardized arm cranking and task-specific pushing-pulling.

Authors:  Rammohan V Maikala; Yagesh N Bhambhani
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Aerobic power and peak power of elite America's Cup sailors.

Authors:  Vernon Neville; Matthew T G Pain; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Does the amount of exercising muscle alter the aerobic demand of dynamic exercise?

Authors:  M D Hoffman; K M Kassay; A I Zeni; P S Clifford
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

Review 5.  The physiology of rock climbing.

Authors:  Luisa V Giles; Edward C Rhodes; Jack E Taunton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic research: problems and prospects.

Authors:  R E LaPorte; H J Montoye; C J Caspersen
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Exercise testing, training and arm ergometry.

Authors:  B A Franklin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  A comparative analysis of physiological responses at submaximal workloads during different laboratory simulations of field cycling.

Authors:  G P Kenny; F D Reardon; A Marion; J S Thoden
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1995

9.  Anaerobic and aerobic components during arm-crank exercise in sprint and middle-distance swimmers.

Authors:  B Mercier; P Granier; J Mercier; J Trouquet; C Préfaut
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

10.  Comparison of peak oxygen uptake in arm cranking.

Authors:  R A Washburn; D R Seals
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.