BACKGROUND: In vitro cell culture data and preclinical models suggest that tamoxifen modulates tumor cell sensitivity to a wide range of therapeutic agents. In the current study, the authors examined whether high-dose tamoxifen (HDT) improved the overall and complete response in patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with concurrent biochemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were treated with a biochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine, vinblastine, cisplatin, decrescendo interleukin-2, interferon-alpha-2b, and tamoxifen. The study had a 2-step design, beginning with a tamoxifen dose escalation from 40 mg to 320 mg (17 subjects) to evaluate safety and tolerability, followed by Phase II accrual of 32 patients to HDT (320 mg) to assess clinical efficacy. Efficacy was compared with a similar modified biochemotherapy regimen with low-dose tamoxifen (LDT). Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to determine in vivo tamoxifen levels. RESULTS: Tamoxifen dose escalation was completed without any reported dose-limiting toxicity. The overall response rate in the HDT group was 50% (95% confidence interval, 33.2%-66.8%), with a complete response rate of 6% and a median survival of 9.5 months. The overall response rate was not improved and the complete response and survival appeared inferior compared with that of patients recently treated with concurrent biochemotherapy and LDT. Serum tamoxifen levels were found to correlate with the dose administered, with a mean of 0.9 microM at the 40-mg dose to 4.6 microM at the 320-mg dose. Ultrafiltered protein-free sera demonstrated low (< 0.01 microM) concentrations of tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of HDT to a regimen of concurrent biochemotherapy did not appear to improve response rates or overall survival, despite reaching the targeted plasma concentration. Unknown drug interactions or high protein binding of tamoxifen may account for the lack of clinical effectiveness. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: In vitro cell culture data and preclinical models suggest that tamoxifen modulates tumor cell sensitivity to a wide range of therapeutic agents. In the current study, the authors examined whether high-dose tamoxifen (HDT) improved the overall and complete response in patients with metastatic melanoma who were treated with concurrent biochemotherapy. METHODS: Forty-nine patients were treated with a biochemotherapy regimen of dacarbazine, vinblastine, cisplatin, decrescendo interleukin-2, interferon-alpha-2b, and tamoxifen. The study had a 2-step design, beginning with a tamoxifen dose escalation from 40 mg to 320 mg (17 subjects) to evaluate safety and tolerability, followed by Phase II accrual of 32 patients to HDT (320 mg) to assess clinical efficacy. Efficacy was compared with a similar modified biochemotherapy regimen with low-dose tamoxifen (LDT). Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to determine in vivo tamoxifen levels. RESULTS:Tamoxifen dose escalation was completed without any reported dose-limiting toxicity. The overall response rate in the HDT group was 50% (95% confidence interval, 33.2%-66.8%), with a complete response rate of 6% and a median survival of 9.5 months. The overall response rate was not improved and the complete response and survival appeared inferior compared with that of patients recently treated with concurrent biochemotherapy and LDT. Serum tamoxifen levels were found to correlate with the dose administered, with a mean of 0.9 microM at the 40-mg dose to 4.6 microM at the 320-mg dose. Ultrafiltered protein-free sera demonstrated low (< 0.01 microM) concentrations of tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of HDT to a regimen of concurrent biochemotherapy did not appear to improve response rates or overall survival, despite reaching the targeted plasma concentration. Unknown drug interactions or high protein binding of tamoxifen may account for the lack of clinical effectiveness. Copyright 2001 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Hyehun Choi; Nicholas Ettinger; Jeffrey Rohrbough; Anna Dikalova; Hong N Nguyen; Fred S Lamb Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2016-11-09 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Samy A F Morad; Su-Fern Tan; David J Feith; Mark Kester; David F Claxton; Thomas P Loughran; Brian M Barth; Todd E Fox; Myles C Cabot Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2015-03-10
Authors: Samy A F Morad; Terence E Ryan; P Darrell Neufer; Tonya N Zeczycki; Traci S Davis; Matthew R MacDougall; Todd E Fox; Su-Fern Tan; David J Feith; Thomas P Loughran; Mark Kester; David F Claxton; Brian M Barth; Tye G Deering; Myles C Cabot Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Dierk Thomas; Bernd Gut; Syrus Karsai; Anna-Britt Wimmer; Kezhong Wu; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Wei Zhang; Sven Kathöfer; Wolfgang Schoels; Hugo A Katus; Johann Kiehn; Christoph A Karle Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2003-06-25 Impact factor: 3.000