AIM: Obstruction of the upper urinary tract, hydronephrosis, is not uncommon in the context of primary or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). Its presence poses a therapeutic dilemma. This study focuses on the significance of hydronephrosis as a prognostic marker for CRC by analysing the resectability and survival rates of patients affected. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data of 52 patients with hydronephrosis were analysed. Ten had primary CRC at different sites and 42 developed hydronephrosis 1-84 months following resection of a primary CRC. Twenty eight had unilateral and 24 bilateral hydronephrosis. RESULTS: In 10 patients with primary CRC and in 38 of those with a history of CRC, hydronephrosis was secondary to malignant obstruction. In four it was related to iatrogenic injury to the urinary tract. Complete surgical resection was possible in five patients (10%) with malignant obstruction. The remaining 90% underwent palliative or no surgical treatment due to diffuse metastasis or extensive local disease. No difference in survival was found between these two groups (6 vs 8 months) nor when comparing CEA levels, Duke's staging, or unilateral vs bilateral hydronephrosis. Patients with benign obstruction were treated by a ureteric stent, leading to resolution of hydronephrosis. All four are alive. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant hydronephrosis, secondary to primary or recurrent CRC, represents local manifestation of a disseminated disease with almost no probability of long-term survival and cure. It would seem that patients with such disease do not benefit from aggressive operations. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.
AIM: Obstruction of the upper urinary tract, hydronephrosis, is not uncommon in the context of primary or recurrent colorectal cancer (CRC). Its presence poses a therapeutic dilemma. This study focuses on the significance of hydronephrosis as a prognostic marker for CRC by analysing the resectability and survival rates of patients affected. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data of 52 patients with hydronephrosis were analysed. Ten had primary CRC at different sites and 42 developed hydronephrosis 1-84 months following resection of a primary CRC. Twenty eight had unilateral and 24 bilateral hydronephrosis. RESULTS: In 10 patients with primary CRC and in 38 of those with a history of CRC, hydronephrosis was secondary to malignant obstruction. In four it was related to iatrogenic injury to the urinary tract. Complete surgical resection was possible in five patients (10%) with malignant obstruction. The remaining 90% underwent palliative or no surgical treatment due to diffuse metastasis or extensive local disease. No difference in survival was found between these two groups (6 vs 8 months) nor when comparing CEA levels, Duke's staging, or unilateral vs bilateral hydronephrosis. Patients with benign obstruction were treated by a ureteric stent, leading to resolution of hydronephrosis. All four are alive. CONCLUSIONS:Malignant hydronephrosis, secondary to primary or recurrent CRC, represents local manifestation of a disseminated disease with almost no probability of long-term survival and cure. It would seem that patients with such disease do not benefit from aggressive operations. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.