Literature DB >> 11502901

Training clinical researchers in neurology: we must do better.

S P Ringel1, J F Steiner, B G Vickrey, S S Spencer.   

Abstract

The pace of scientific discoveries, the increasing complexity of managing patients, and the runaway cost of neurological services have created an urgent need for a wide range of clinical research in neurology. Despite increasing recognition of this need and recent increases in funding for training clinical investigators, neurologists conducting cellular and molecular investigations are more likely to join faculties, maintain research careers, and attain academic advancement. Because academic departments of neurology are successful in producing and nurturing basic science researchers, why aren't they just as triumphant in spawning clinical investigators? This crisis in the preparation of clinical investigators has been brought about by many factors: competing time demands for clinical service, lack of methodologically rigorous training in the disciplines necessary to conduct clinical research, and lack of mentorship. Neurology residents contemplating a clinical research career may observe junior faculty who lack career guidance, are ill-prepared as independent investigators, and must juggle patient demands while trying to write a research grant or conduct a study. Already burdened by medical school debts, is it any wonder that our neurology graduates don't leap to a career with a future that seems so insecure? Academic departments of neurology must develop full-scale clinical research training programs if they are to meet the pressing need for clinical research. As a starting point, they must free themselves from their dependence on providing clinical services to generate income. Following the model which has produced successful basic researchers, much greater effort must be given to establishing rigorous methodological training in collaboration with other departments, creating senior role models, and protecting time for clinical investigators to conduct research. Unless we create incentives to careers in clinical research, we will never answer the growing number of clinical research questions we face today.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11502901     DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.3.388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  4 in total

1.  The physician-scientist in Canadian psychiatry.

Authors:  William G Honer; Mary Ann Linseman
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  A young life sadly blighted--the future for clinical academic careers in general practice.

Authors:  Amanda Howe; Yvonne Carter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Emerging subspecialties in neurology: health services research.

Authors:  Nabila Dahodwala; Ana-Claire Meyer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  RRApp, a robust randomization app, for clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Chengcheng Tu; Emma K T Benn
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-02-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.