M I Park1, J H Hwang, K J Cha, Y S Park, S K Koh. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea. parkmi@hanyang.ac.kr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to define the reference ranges for fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters according to gestational age, by determining the relationship between the FHR and gestational age using a computerized FHR analysis system. METHODS: Using our own software developed by Hanyang University Hospital in Korea, non-stress tests were performed for 20 min. FHR parameters for 6455 subjects were analyzed for various gestational groups; <25 weeks, 25-28 weeks, 29-32 weeks, 33-36 weeks, 37-40 weeks, and >40 weeks. RESULTS: The FHR parameters were related to gestational age. The mean baseline FHR, signal loss, and fetal movements decreased significantly with gestation (P<0.0001). The variability and accelerations of FHR were highest for the 37-40 weeks gestational group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that overall, the differences in the FHR parameters between gestational groups were statistically significant, and the gestational age of the fetus should be considered when interpreting FHR patterns.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to define the reference ranges for fetal heart rate (FHR) parameters according to gestational age, by determining the relationship between the FHR and gestational age using a computerized FHR analysis system. METHODS: Using our own software developed by Hanyang University Hospital in Korea, non-stress tests were performed for 20 min. FHR parameters for 6455 subjects were analyzed for various gestational groups; <25 weeks, 25-28 weeks, 29-32 weeks, 33-36 weeks, 37-40 weeks, and >40 weeks. RESULTS: The FHR parameters were related to gestational age. The mean baseline FHR, signal loss, and fetal movements decreased significantly with gestation (P<0.0001). The variability and accelerations of FHR were highest for the 37-40 weeks gestational group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that overall, the differences in the FHR parameters between gestational groups were statistically significant, and the gestational age of the fetus should be considered when interpreting FHR patterns.
Authors: Václav Chudáček; Jiří Spilka; Miroslav Burša; Petr Janků; Lukáš Hruban; Michal Huptych; Lenka Lhotská Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Lauren C Shuffrey; Michael M Myers; Hein J Odendaal; Amy J Elliott; Carlie du Plessis; Coen Groenewald; Larry Burd; Jyoti Angal; J David Nugent; Joseph R Isler; William P Fifer Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: Maria F Hurtado-Sánchez; David Pérez-Melero; Andrea Pinto-Ibáñez; Ernesto González-Mesa; Juan Mozas-Moreno; Alberto Puertas-Prieto Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2021-05-25 Impact factor: 2.430