Literature DB >> 11502083

Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: an expert consensus approach.

D R Lynam1, T A Widiger.   

Abstract

This study sought to extend previous work on the five-factor dimensional model (FFM) of personality disorder (PD) by developing more comprehensive FFM descriptions of prototypic cases. Specifically, the authors asked experts in each of the 10 DSM-IV PDs to rate the prototypic case by using all 30 facets of the FFM. Aggregating across raters of the given disorder generated a prototype for each disorder. In general, there was good agreement among experts and with previous theoretical and empirical FFM translations of DSM diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, the ability of the FFM explanation to reproduce the high comorbidity rates among PDs was demonstrated. The authors concluded that, with the possible exception of schizotypal PD, the DSM PDs can be understood from the dimensional perspective of the FFM. Future directions for research, including the use of the present prototypes to "diagnose" personality disorder, are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11502083     DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.110.3.401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  70 in total

1.  The interpersonal problems of the socially avoidant: self and peer shared variance.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Mayumi Okada Gianoli; Eric Turkheimer; Thomas F Oltmanns
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2010-05

2.  Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Kristian E Markon; Robert F Krueger; David Watson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-01

3.  The five-factor model in schizotypal personality disorder.

Authors:  Ronald J Gurrera; Chandlee C Dickey; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Martina M Voglmaier; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  The factor structure of the DSM-III-R personality disorders: an evaluation of competing models.

Authors:  Thomas L Rodebaugh; Dianne L Chambless; Babette Renneberg; Thomas Fydrich
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

5.  Evaluating the assessment of the ICD-11 personality disorder diagnostic system.

Authors:  Joshua R Oltmanns; Thomas A Widiger
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-01-10

6.  Borderline personality disorder is equally trait-like and state-like over ten years in adult psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Christopher C Conway; Christopher J Hopwood; Leslie C Morey; Andrew E Skodol
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2018-06-28

7.  Measurement invariance of the DSM-5 Section III pathological personality trait model across sex.

Authors:  Takakuni Suzuki; Susan C South; Douglas B Samuel; Aidan G C Wright; Matthew M Yalch; Christopher J Hopwood; Katherine M Thomas
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2018-06-28

8.  Assessment procedures for narcissistic personality disorder: a comparison of the personality diagnostic questionnaire-4 and best-estimate clinical judgments.

Authors:  Joshua D Miller; W Keith Campbell; Paul A Pilkonis; Jennifer Q Morse
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2008-06-11

9.  Self-Absorbed and Socially (Network) Engaged: Narcissistic Traits and Social Networking Site Use.

Authors:  Kaitlyn Burnell; Robert A Ackerman; Diana J Meter; Samuel E Ehrenreich; Marion K Underwood
Journal:  J Res Pers       Date:  2019-11-11

10.  Dial a feeling: Detecting moderation of affect decline during ostracism.

Authors:  Eric D Wesselmann; James H Wirth; Daniel K Mroczek; Kipling D Williams
Journal:  Pers Individ Dif       Date:  2012-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.