Literature DB >> 11500797

Local field potentials related to bimanual movements in the primary and supplementary motor cortices.

O Donchin1, A Gribova, O Steinberg, H Bergman, S Cardoso de Oliveira, E Vaadia.   

Abstract

We recorded local field potentials (LFP) in primary (MI) and supplementary (SMA) motor areas of rhesus monkey cortex in order to compare movement-evoked potentials (mEP) in bimanual and unimanual movements with single-unit activity recorded concurrently. The mEP was often different during bimanual and unimanual movements (a "bimanual-related" effect), but, unlike the single units, the size of the mEP in both MI and SMA was always greater during bimanual movements than during unimanual movements. This increase primarily reflected an increase in the late positive peak of the mEP, a result that may reflect greater overall cortical activation during bimanual movements. In addition, analysis of the mEP revealed differences between MI and SMA not seen in the single-unit activity. mEP in MI had greater contralateral preference than in SMA. Also, SMA mEP was more correlated to the single-unit activity than in MI. This greater correlation was also more apparent in the late peaks of the mEP than in the early peaks and may reflect a greater influence of recurrent activation in SMA than in MI. Our results further reinforce the idea that unimanual and bimanual movements are represented differently both in MI and in SMA and also show that a complex relationship between spikes of individual neurons and LFP may reflect the different input-output relations of different cortical areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11500797     DOI: 10.1007/s002210100784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  18 in total

1.  High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements.

Authors:  Maarten Steyvers; Seiji Etoh; Dieter Sauner; Oron Levin; Hartwig R Siebner; Stephan P Swinnen; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Evoked potentials in motor cortical local field potentials reflect task timing and behavioral performance.

Authors:  Bjørg Elisabeth Kilavik; Joachim Confais; Adrián Ponce-Alvarez; Markus Diesmann; Alexa Riehle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Interactions between interlimb and intralimb coordination during the performance of bimanual multijoint movements.

Authors:  Yong Li; Oron Levin; Arturo Forner-Cordero; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Corticospinal disinhibition during dual action.

Authors:  Young H Sohn; Suk Y Kang; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits?

Authors:  Sandy McCombe Waller; Jill Whitall
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.138

6.  Relationships among low-frequency local field potentials, spiking activity, and three-dimensional reach and grasp kinematics in primary motor and ventral premotor cortices.

Authors:  Arjun K Bansal; Carlos E Vargas-Irwin; Wilson Truccolo; John P Donoghue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Unilateral imagined movement increases interhemispheric inhibition from the contralateral to ipsilateral motor cortex.

Authors:  Nan Liang; Kozo Funase; Makoto Takahashi; Kanji Matsukawa; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Population interactions between parietal and primary motor cortices during reach.

Authors:  David L Menzer; Naveen G Rao; Adrian Bondy; Wilson Truccolo; John P Donoghue
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Primary Generators of Visually Evoked Field Potentials Recorded in the Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; John F Smiley; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The organization of intralimb and interlimb synergies in response to different joint dynamics.

Authors:  Ya-weng Tseng; John P Scholz; James C Galloway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.