Literature DB >> 11500074

Effect of socioeconomic status on aphasia severity and recovery.

L T Connor1, L K Obler, M Tocco, P M Fitzpatrick, M L Albert.   

Abstract

Low levels of educational attainment and low socioeconomic status have been significantly linked to poor health and increased incidence of disease, including Alzheimer's disease and diseases of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, and gastrointestinal systems. Our goal in the present study was to determine the degree to which educational level and socioeconomic status influence initial severity of aphasia and subsequent recovery. We evaluated the records of 39 persons with aphasia twice: at about 4 months and 103 months postonset. We found early severity of aphasia to be significantly greater for subjects in the lower educational and occupational groups. However, rate of recovery (the slope of the recovery curve) was the same regardless of educational or occupational status. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11500074     DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2459

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  13 in total

1.  Quality of life in aphasic patients 1 year after a first stroke.

Authors:  Michèle Koleck; Kamel Gana; Claire Lucot; Bénédicte Darrigrand; Jean-Michel Mazaux; Bertrand Glize
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Formal education, socioeconomic status, and the severity of aphasia after stroke.

Authors:  Marlís González-Fernández; Cameron Davis; John J Molitoris; Melissa Newhart; Richard Leigh; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Progression of Aphasia Severity in the Chronic Stages of Stroke.

Authors:  Lisa Johnson; Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Bo Cai; Leonardo Bonilha; Chris Rorden; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Inequalities in recovery or methodological artefact? A comparison of models across physical and mental health functioning.

Authors:  Salmela Jatta; Brunton-Smith Ian; Meadows Robert
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2022-03-05

5.  Ambient experience in restitutive treatment of aphasia.

Authors:  Jill S McClung; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi; Stephen E Nadeau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Language recovery following stroke.

Authors:  Adam Gerstenecker; Ronald M Lazar
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Behavioural clusters and predictors of performance during recovery from stroke.

Authors:  L E Ramsey; J S Siegel; C E Lang; M Strube; G L Shulman; M Corbetta
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-02-17

Review 8.  Variability in recovery from aphasia.

Authors:  Ronald M Lazar; Daniel Antoniello
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Stroke Recurrence and Its Relationship With Language Abilities.

Authors:  Emily B Goldberg; Erin L Meier; Shannon M Sheppard; Bonnie L Breining; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 10.  Literacy as a determining factor for brain organization: from Lecours' contribution to the present day.

Authors:  Maria Alice de Mattos Pimenta Parente; Rochele Paz Fonseca; Lilian Cristine Scherer
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.