Literature DB >> 11498832

Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

E P Mamounas1, B Fisher.   

Abstract

The concept of using preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer originated from experimental and clinical observations, as well as from theoretical hypotheses on tumor cell growth and dissemination. Results from nonrandomized studies with different chemotherapeutic agents or combination regimens given preoperatively demonstrated substantial clinical response rates but low pathologic tumor response rates. In addition, several such studies were able to show that-by reducing primary breast tumor size-preoperative chemotherapy can lead to an increase in the rate of breast-preserving procedures. Although nonrandomized studies provided useful clinical information about the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on primary breast tumors and on axillary nodes involved with tumor, they could not address the relative efficacy of preoperative versus postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). As a result, several randomized trials were implemented to address the above questions. Some of the earlier trials, however, were not designed as straightforward comparisons of preoperative versus postoperative chemotherapy and, thus, did not provide meaningful answers to the fundamental question of whether DFS and OS can be prolonged by the administration of chemotherapy before surgery rather than after. The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 trial was the largest randomized trial that aimed to compare preoperative to postoperative chemotherapy in operable breast cancer. Results from this trial on the effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease and outcome are presented. The potential advantages and disadvantages of each approach, as well as surgical considerations and current and future directions in the use of preoperative chemotherapy, are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11498832     DOI: 10.1016/s0093-7754(01)90132-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  17 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Fitzal; O Riedl; R Jakesz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Low pretreatment lymphocyte/monocyte ratio is associated with the better efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yang Peng; Rui Chen; Fanli Qu; Ying Ye; Yong Fu; Zhenrong Tang; Yihua Wang; Beige Zong; Haochen Yu; Feng Luo; Shengchun Liu
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging shrinkage patterns following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinomas with an emphasis on the radiopathological correlations.

Authors:  Kaori Tomida; Mitsuaki Ishida; Tomoko Umeda; Sachiko Sakai; Yuki Kawai; Tsuyoshi Mori; Yoshihiro Kubota; Eiji Mekata; Shigeyuki Naka; Hajime Abe; Hidetoshi Okabe; Tohru Tani
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30

4.  Genetic counseling and clinical management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations: perspective of a surgical oncologist.

Authors:  Edibaldo Silva
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Genomic grade index is associated with response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Christos Hatzis; William Fraser Symmans; Christine Desmedt; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Vicente Valero; Henry Kuerer; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Martine Piccart-Gebhart; Christos Sotiriou; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Neoadjuvant therapy in the treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mediget Teshome; Kelly K Hunt
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.495

7.  Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma: effective clinical downstaging allows breast preservation and predicts outstanding local control and survival.

Authors:  William G Cance; Lisa A Carey; Benjamin F Calvo; Carolyn Sartor; Lynda Sawyer; Dominic T Moore; Julian Rosenman; David W Ollila; Mark Graham
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Quantification of the response of circulating epithelial cells to neodadjuvant treatment for breast cancer: a new tool for therapy monitoring.

Authors:  Katharina Pachmann; Oumar Camara; Andreas Kavallaris; Uwe Schneider; Stefanie Schünemann; Klaus Höffken
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Is drug-induced toxicity a good predictor of response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer?--a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Vinay Singhal; J P Singh; Ashima Lyall; Sunita Saxena; Anju Bansal
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Pretreatment haemoglobin levels significantly predict the tumour response to primary chemotherapy in human breast cancer.

Authors:  A Bottini; A Berruti; M P Brizzi; A Bersiga; D Generali; G Allevi; S Aguggini; G Bolsi; S Bonardi; G Bertoli; P Alquati; L Dogliotti
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.