Literature DB >> 11498738

Collection of hematopoietic stem cells from patients with autoimmune diseases.

R K Burt1, A Fassas, J Snowden, J M van Laar, T Kozak, N M Wulffraat, R A Nash, C E Dunbar, R Arnold, G Prentice, S Bingham, A M Marmont, P A McSweeney.   

Abstract

We reviewed data from 24 transplant centers in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America to determine the outcomes of stem cell collection including methods used, cell yields, effects on disease activity, and complications in patients with autoimmune diseases. Twenty-one unprimed bone marrow harvests and 174 peripheral blood stem cell mobilizations were performed on 187 patients. Disease indications were multiple sclerosis (76 patients), rheumatoid arthritis (37 patients), scleroderma (26 patients), systemic lupus erythematosus (19 patients), juvenile chronic arthritis (13 patients), idiopathic autoimmune thrombocytopenia (8 patients), Behcet's disease (3 patients), undifferentiated vasculitis (3 patients), polychondritis (1 patient) and polymyositis (1 patient). Bone marrow harvests were used in the Peoples Republic of China and preferred worldwide for children. PBSC mobilization was the preferred technique for adult stem cell collection in America, Australia, and Europe. Methods of PBSC mobilization included G-CSF (5, 10, or 16 microg/kg/day) or cyclophosphamide (2 or 4 g/m2) with either G-CSF (5 or 10 microg/kg/day) or GM-CSF (5 microg/kg/day). Bone marrow harvests were without complications and did not affect disease activity. A combination of cyclophosphamide and G-CSF was more likely to ameliorate disease activity than G-CSF alone (P < 0.001). g-csf alone was more likely to cause disease exacerbation than the combination of cyclophosphamide and g-csf (P = 0.003). Three patients died as a result of cyclophosphamide-based stem cell collection (2.6% of patients mobilized with cyclophosphamide). When corrected for patient weight and apheresis volume, progenitor cell yields tended to vary by underlying disease, prior medication history and mobilization regimen. Trends in the approaches to, and results of, progenitor cell mobilization are suggested by this survey. While cytokine-based mobilization appears less toxic, it is more likely to result in disease reactivation. Optimization with regard to cell yields and safety are likely to be disease-specific and prospective disease-specific studies of mobilization procedures appear warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11498738     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  26 in total

Review 1.  Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Authors:  L R Wedderburn; M Abinun; P Palmer; H E Foster
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  High-dose immunosuppressive therapy for severe systemic sclerosis: initial outcomes.

Authors:  Peter A McSweeney; Richard A Nash; Keith M Sullivan; Jan Storek; Leslie J Crofford; Roger Dansey; Maureen D Mayes; Kevin T McDonagh; J Lee Nelson; Theodore A Gooley; Leona A Holmberg; C S Chen; Mark H Wener; Katherine Ryan; Julie Sunderhaus; Ken Russell; John Rambharose; Rainer Storb; Daniel E Furst
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of systemic sclerosis: report from the EBMT/EULAR Registry.

Authors:  D Farge; J Passweg; J M van Laar; Z Marjanovic; C Besenthal; J Finke; H H Peter; F C Breedveld; W E Fibbe; C Black; C Denton; I Koetter; F Locatelli; A Martini; A V N Schattenberg; F van den Hoogen; L van de Putte; F Lanza; R Arnold; P A Bacon; S Bingham; F Ciceri; B Didier; J L Diez-Martin; P Emery; W Feremans; B Hertenstein; F Hiepe; R Luosujärvi; A Leon Lara; A Marmont; A M Martinez; H Pascual Cascon; C Bocelli-Tyndall; E Gluckman; A Gratwohl; A Tyndall
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Immunomodulatory therapy for SSc: will high-intensity immunosuppression with stem cell rescue improve outcome?

Authors:  Leslie J Crofford
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for severe multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Li Su; Juan Xu; Bing-Xin Ji; Sui-Gui Wan; Cong-Yan Lu; Hui-Qing Dong; Yue-Yi Yu; Dao-Pei Lu
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.490

6.  A phase I-II trial of autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in the treatment of refractory autoimmune disease.

Authors:  H Tsukamoto; K Nagafuji; T Horiuchi; T Miyamoto; K Aoki; K Takase; H Henzan; D Himeji; T Koyama; K Miyake; Y Inoue; H Nakashima; T Otsuka; Y Tanaka; K Nagasawa; M Harada
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  High-dose immunosuppressive therapy and autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for severe multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard A Nash; James D Bowen; Peter A McSweeney; Steven Z Pavletic; Kenneth R Maravilla; Man-soo Park; Jan Storek; Keith M Sullivan; Jinan Al-Omaishi; John R Corboy; John DiPersio; George E Georges; Theodore A Gooley; Leona A Holmberg; C Fred LeMaistre; Kate Ryan; Harry Openshaw; Julie Sunderhaus; Rainer Storb; Joseph Zunt; George H Kraft
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Neurological complications of transplantation: part I: hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Amy A Pruitt; Francesc Graus; Myrna R Rosenfeld
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-01

9.  Increased numbers of circulating hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells are chronically maintained in patients treated with the CD49d blocking antibody natalizumab.

Authors:  Halvard Bonig; Annette Wundes; Kai-Hsin Chang; Sylvia Lucas; Thalia Papayannopoulou
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  The contribution of neutrophils to CNS autoimmunity.

Authors:  Emily R Pierson; Catriona A Wagner; Joan M Goverman
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.