Literature DB >> 11498317

Influence of pneumoperitoneum and patient positioning on respiratory system compliance.

R Rauh1, T M Hemmerling, M Rist, K E Jacobi.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of pneumoperitoneum (PP) and posture on respiratory compliance and ventilation pressures.
DESIGN: Prospective, single blind trial. PATIENTS: 10 female ASA physical status I and II patients scheduled for elective gynecologic laparoscopy.
SETTING: University medical center.
INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was performed as total IV anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol, alfentanil, and atracurium. After induction of anesthesia and orotracheal intubation, the lungs were ventilated to maintain partial pressure of CO(2) (P(ET)CO(2)) of 30 +/- 3 mmHg. Ventilation was kept constant. As gas mixture oxygen and air 1:1 was used without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). MEASUREMENTS: Measurements were taken before and after creation of pneumoperitoneum with an intraabdominal pressure (IAP) of 10 mmHg, of 15 mmHg in 20 degrees head-down tilt, then in 20 degrees head-up tilt, and after deflation of PP. We determined peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), mean airway pressure (mPaw), P(ET)CO(2), expiratory minute volume (V(E)), heart rate (HR), and systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Respiratory system compliance (C(eff rs)) was calculated as quotient of tidal volume (V(T)) and PIP. MAIN
RESULTS: After creation of PP (IAP 10 mmHg), there was a significant increase of median PIP (3 cmH(2)O), mPaw (1 cm H(2)O) and arterial pressure (BP), (MAP by 7 mmHg), C(eff rs) decreased by 6 mL. cm H(2)O(-1). Increase of IAP to 15 mmHg led to a further increase of PIP (2 cm H(2)O) and mPaw (1 cm H(2)O), and a further decrease of C(eff rs) by 5 mL cm H(2)O(-1); BP decreased (MAP by 5.5 mmHg). Head-up or head down positions showed no significant hemodynamic or pulmonary changes. P(ET)CO(2)increased from 29.5 to 36 mmHg at an IAP of 15 mmHg, but then no further changes were noticed. Five minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum all values returned to baseline levels.
CONCLUSIONS: Creation of PP at an IAP of 15 mmHg reduced respiratory system compliance, and increased peak inspiratory and mean airway pressures, which quickly returned to normal values after deflation. Head-down or head-up position did not further alter those parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11498317     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00286-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  35 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of laparoscopic surgery on the patterns of death in elderly colorectal cancer patients: competing risk analysis compared with open surgery.

Authors:  Kohei Shigeta; Hideo Baba; Kazuo Yamafuji; Atsunori Asami; Kaoru Takeshima; Kazuhito Nagasaki; Nobuhiko Okamoto; Takeshi Murata; Shu Arai; Kiyoshi Kubochi; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery using low-pressure pneumoperitoneum combined with abdominal wall lift by placement of anchoring sutures around the camera port.

Authors:  I J Park; S H Kim; Y G Joh; K Y Hahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ameliorating effects of CAPE on oxidative damage caused by pneumoperitoneum in rat lung tissue.

Authors:  Isil Davarci; Harun Alp; Tumay Ozgur; Murat Karcioglu; Kasim Tuzcu; Osman Evliyaoglu; Sedat Motor; Tulin Durgun Yetim
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

5.  Comparison of the effects of deep and moderate neuromuscular block on respiratory system compliance and surgical space conditions during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Shao-Jun Zhu; Xiao-Lin Zhang; Qing Xie; Yan-Feng Zhou; Kui-Rong Wang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2020 Aug.       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 6.  Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum.

Authors:  C P Henny; J Hofland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Correlation of CO2 pneumoperitoneal pressures between rodents and humans.

Authors:  Shmuel Avital; Refael Itah; Samuel Szomstein; Raul Rosenthal; Roye Inbar; Yehuda Sckornik; Avi Weinbroum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Physiologic and anesthetic considerations in octogenarians undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Todd; Nikhil Vasdev; Naeem A Soomro
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

9.  Anaesthesia Management of a Patient with Incidentally Diagnosed Diaphragmatic Hernia During Laparoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  Mehtap Özdemir; Pınar Yonca Yanlı; Şenay Göksu Tomruk; Nurten Bakan
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-09-09

10.  Impact of the patient's body position on the intraabdominal workspace during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jan Paul J Mulier; Bruno Dillemans; Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.