Literature DB >> 11497416

Human neural responses elicited to observing the actions of others.

K J Wheaton1, A Pipingas, R B Silberstein, A Puce.   

Abstract

Monkey electrophysiological and human neuroimaging studies indicate the existence of specialized neural systems for the perception and execution of actions. To date, the dynamics of these neural systems in humans have not been well studied. Here, we investigated the spatial and temporal behavior of human neural responses elicited to viewing motion of the face, hand, and body. Scalp event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in 20 participants viewing videotaped mouth (opening, closing), hand (closing, opening), and body stepping (forward, backward) movements. ERP peak differences within the movements of each body part were compared using topographical maps of voltage, voltage difference, and Student's t-test at ERP peak latencies. Predominantly temporoparietal negative ERPs occurred to motion of all body parts within 200 ms postmovement onset. Hand closure elicited a significantly greater negativity than opening, particularly in the left hemisphere. Vertex positive ERPs within 300 ms postmovement onset were elicited to hand and body motion. A significantly greater positivity occurred for the body stepping forward relative to stepping backward. The ERP topography was consistent with observed activation foci in human neuroimaging studies. Our data indicate that the neural activity of a system dedicated to the perception of high-level motion stimuli can rapidly differentiate between movements across and within body parts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497416     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523801183069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  12 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion.

Authors:  Aina Puce; David Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Neural responses elicited to face motion and vocalization pairings.

Authors:  Aina Puce; James A Epling; James C Thompson; Olivia K Carrick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Hippocampal temporal-parietal junction interaction in the production of psychotic symptoms: a framework for understanding the schizophrenic syndrome.

Authors:  Cynthia G Wible
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The perception of animacy in young children with autism.

Authors:  M D Rutherford; Bruce F Pennington; Sally J Rogers
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-11

5.  An ERP study of emotional face processing in the adult and infant brain.

Authors:  Jukka M Leppänen; Margaret C Moulson; Vanessa K Vogel-Farley; Charles A Nelson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

6.  Human infants dissociate structural and dynamic information in biological motion: evidence from neural systems.

Authors:  Vincent M Reid; Stefanie Hoehl; Jennifer Landt; Tricia Striano
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Neural correlates of apparent motion perception of impoverished facial stimuli: a comparison of ERP and ERSP activity.

Authors:  Alejandra Rossi; Francisco J Parada; Artemy Kolchinsky; Aina Puce
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Different categories of living and non-living sound-sources activate distinct cortical networks.

Authors:  Lauren R Engel; Chris Frum; Aina Puce; Nathan A Walker; James W Lewis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Magnetoencephalographic study on facial movements.

Authors:  Kensaku Miki; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Temporal Dynamics of Perceiving Other's Painful Actions.

Authors:  Fang Cui; Ruolei Gu; Xiangru Zhu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.