Literature DB >> 11497360

Risk-benefit analysis of prophylactic pinning in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

K Seller1, P Raab, A Wild, R Krauspe.   

Abstract

There is a broad and controversial discussion about the surgical procedure and the type of hardware for internal transfixation of the epiphysis and metaphysis in slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Prophylactic pinning is even more controversial. One hundred and nine patients showing SCFE underwent a one-stage bilateral fixation of the epiphysis with three or four Kirschner wires (pins). From these 109 patients (69 male and 40 female), 94 had an unilateral slip and were operated prophylactically on the contralateral side. There were no complications such as avascular necrosis of the femoral head, chondrolysis, bone fracture, failure of metal implant, osteomyelitis or deep wound infection either at the time of surgery or at the minimum follow-up of 1 year with prophylactic pinning in SCFE. Therefore, we consider pinning allows for efficient stabilization, reliably preventing any progression of SCFE on the affected side and, furthermore, prevents the incidence of a secondary slip on the primarily nondisplaced contralateral side. The transfixation of epiphysis and metaphysis with Kirschner wires (pins) shows good subjective and objective long-term results compared with other surgical methods and implants. There is only a low morbidity rate with this method, because reoperations may only become necessary in the younger age group owing to normal growth of the femoral neck, compared with a high benefit from prophylactic surgical treatment of the nonaffected opposite side at the time of unilateral onset of the disease. The pins may no longer catch the epiphysis but further growth will allow for remodeling of the femoral head and for an optimal neck/shaft ratio. In case of further growth and relative shortening of the pins, refixation may become necessary. Therefore, we like to recommend the Kirschner-wire transfixation (pinning) of the epiphysis and metaphysis in patients with SCFE for primary treatment of SCFE as well as for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral side in one sitting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B        ISSN: 1060-152X            Impact factor:   1.041


  21 in total

1.  The gait function of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in patients after growth arrest and its correlation with the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Bettina Westhoff; Katharina Ruhe; Kristina Weimann-Stahlschmidt; Christoph Zilkens; Reinhart Willers; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Slipped capital femoral epiphysis and overweight].

Authors:  A K Hell
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Clinical outcome after transfixation of the epiphysis with Kirschner wires in unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  K Seller; A Wild; B Westhoff; P Raab; R Krauspe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Computerized navigation for treatment of slipped femoral capital epiphysis.

Authors:  Yoram Weil; Andrew Pearle; Meir Liebergall; Naum Simanovsky; Shlomo Porat; Rami Moshieff
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

5.  Slipped upper femoral epiphysis--a case of a 'dodgem hip'.

Authors:  Dushan Thavarajah; Raja Sekhar Maroju; Lokesh Narayanaswamy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  [Treatment of chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis : Use of dynamic epiphyseal telescopic screws].

Authors:  E Schumann; D Zajonz; M Wojan; F B Kübler; P Brandmaier; C Josten; C-E Heyde; U Bühligen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  [Early and late complications and their management in slipped capital femoral epiphysis].

Authors:  F F Fernandez; O Eberhardt; T Wirth
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Radiological outcome and gait function of SCFE patients after growth arrest.

Authors:  Bettina Westhoff; Katharina Schröder; Kristina Weimann-Stahlschmidt; Christoph Zilkens; Reinhart Willers; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 1.548

9.  CORR Insights®: Morphologic Features of the Contralateral Femur in Patients With Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Resembles Mild Slip Deformity: A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The fate of hips that are not prophylactically pinned after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra; Hamlet A Peterson; Anthony A Stans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.