Literature DB >> 11497138

Efficacy of thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

M Ruiz-Bailén1, E Aguayo de Hoyos, M C Serrano-Córcoles, M A Diáz-Castellanos, J A Ramos-Cuadra, A Reina-Toral.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic thrombolysis administered to resuscitated patients after cardiac arrest (CA) due to an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), through a study of their mortality and haemorrhagic complications.
DESIGN: We studied a retrospective cohort of patients with ischaemic heart disease gathered from the database of the Spanish multi-centre project "Analysis of Delay in AMI" (ARIAM).
SETTING: Intensive care (ICU) and coronary care (CCU) units of 77 Spanish hospitals. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: The study period was from 1 January 1995 to 1 January 2000, when 22,922 patients were included in the ARIAM database register; 13,704 were diagnosed with AMI and we studied 303 of these AMI patients admitted after resuscitation for CA. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Of the 303 patients studied, 228 were male (75.25%); the mean age was 64.57 +/- 12.48 years. Systemic thrombolysis was administered to 67 patients (group I) and the remaining 236 patients were managed without this treatment (group II). The ICU/CCU mortality rate of the series was 39.93 % (121 patients); that of group I was 17.91% (12 patients) and that of group II 46.18% (109 patients) (P < 0.00001). Group I required less mechanical ventilation (group I, 42.85% vs group II, 80.76 %; P < 0.00001) and fewer cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempts (33.34% vs 60.98%, P < 0.0001). Group I also showed a lower incidence of cardiogenic shock (14.28% vs 39.01%, P < 0.0001) and anoxic encephalopathy (8.62% vs 39.89% P = 0.006). There were no fatal haemorrhagic complications in either group. Logistic regression analysis showed the administration of thrombolysis to be an independent variable that protected against mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of thrombolysis to patients with AMI who require resuscitation may be efficacious in reducing mortality and is safe, with no increase in haemorrhagic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497138     DOI: 10.1007/s001340100948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  9 in total

1.  Thrombolytic therapy during and/or after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  S A Padosch; E Martin; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-04-13       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  APACHE-II score and Killip class for patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Juan Mercado-Martínez; Ricardo Rivera-Fernández; Eduardo Aguilar-Alonso; Angel García-Alcántara; Andrés Estivill-Torrull; Agustín Aranda-León; María Consuelo Guia-Rambla; Mari Paz Fuset-Cabanes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Thrombolysis with streptokinase during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a single center experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  Farid Aliyev; Mohammed Habeb; Erhan Babalik; Bilgehan Karadag
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  The previous use of digoxin does not worsen early outcome of acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the ARIAM Registry.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Garcia-Rubira; Manuel Calvo-Taracido; Francisca Francisco-Aparicio; Manuel Almendro-Delia; Alejandro Recio-Mayoral; Antonio Reina Toral; Oscar Aramburu-Bodas; Pastora Gallego García de Vinuesa; José Maria Cruz Fernández; Angel Garcia Alcántara; Rafael Hidalgo-Urbano
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

Review 6.  Safety of thrombolysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Fabian Spöhr; Bernd W Böttiger
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.228

7.  Thrombolysis after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in myocardial infarction with abdominal pain as the first presentation: A case report.

Authors:  Yang-Jian Zheng; Wen-Na Wang; Han-Li Lin; Ya-Nan Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention and thrombolysis in patients with return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Ying-Qing Li; Shu-Jie Sun; Na Liu; Chun-Lin Hu; Hong-Yan Wei; Hui Li; Xiao-Xing Liao; Xin Li
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Double Bolus Thrombolysis for Suspected Massive Pulmonary Embolism during Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Gerard O'Connor; Gareth Fitzpatrick; Ayman El-Gammal; Peadar Gilligan
Journal:  Case Rep Emerg Med       Date:  2015-11-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.