OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 1-h trial of prone positioning is sufficient to identify responders. DESIGN: Prospective clinical cohort study in a medico-surgical ICU in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 49 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: A 6-h period of prone positioning. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline measurements (blood gas analysis and respiratory parameters) were evaluated in supine position just prior to turning the patients prone. Measurements were then repeated 1 h after the beginning of prone positioning (PP1h) and at the end of the 6-h period of prone positioning (PP6h). The last measurements were performed 1 h after repositioning the patients supine. Prone position induced an increase in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (p < 0.001). A response (increase in PaO2/FIO2 ratio of at least 20 % at PP1h and/or at PP6h) was observed in 37 of 49 patients (76%). Twenty-seven of these patients (73%) were responders at PP1h while 10 (27%) were responders only at PP6h- In all, two-thirds of the patients were considered persistent responders. However, whereas the PaO2/FIO2 ratio decreased significantly 1 h after repositioning the fast responders supine, the PaO2/ FIO2 ratio remained unchanged after repositioning slow responders. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term trial of prone positioning does not appear a sufficient method to identify patients who would benefit from the postural treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 1-h trial of prone positioning is sufficient to identify responders. DESIGN: Prospective clinical cohort study in a medico-surgical ICU in a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 49 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. INTERVENTIONS: A 6-h period of prone positioning. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Baseline measurements (blood gas analysis and respiratory parameters) were evaluated in supine position just prior to turning the patients prone. Measurements were then repeated 1 h after the beginning of prone positioning (PP1h) and at the end of the 6-h period of prone positioning (PP6h). The last measurements were performed 1 h after repositioning the patients supine. Prone position induced an increase in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio (p < 0.001). A response (increase in PaO2/FIO2 ratio of at least 20 % at PP1h and/or at PP6h) was observed in 37 of 49 patients (76%). Twenty-seven of these patients (73%) were responders at PP1h while 10 (27%) were responders only at PP6h- In all, two-thirds of the patients were considered persistent responders. However, whereas the PaO2/FIO2 ratio decreased significantly 1 h after repositioning the fast responders supine, the PaO2/ FIO2 ratio remained unchanged after repositioning slow responders. CONCLUSIONS: A short-term trial of prone positioning does not appear a sufficient method to identify patients who would benefit from the postural treatment.
Authors: J Dellamonica; N Lerolle; C Sargentini; S Hubert; G Beduneau; F Di Marco; A Mercat; J L Diehl; J C M Richard; G Bernardin; L Brochard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-01-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Christophe Le Terrier; Florian Sigaud; Said Lebbah; Luc Desmedt; David Hajage; Claude Guérin; Jérôme Pugin; Steve Primmaz; Nicolas Terzi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 9.097