Literature DB >> 11497031

The need for affect: individual differences in the motivation to approach or avoid emotions.

G R Maio1, V M Esses.   

Abstract

The present research developed and tested a new individual-difference measure of the need for affect, which is the motivation to approach or avoid emotion-inducing situations. The first phase of the research developed the need for affect scale. The second phase revealed that the need for affect is related to a number of individual differences in cognitive processes (e.g., need for cognition, need for closure), emotional processes (e.g., affect intensity, repression-sensitization), behavioral inhibition and activation (e.g., sensation seeking), and aspects of personality (Big Five dimensions) in the expected directions, while not being redundant with them. The third phase of the research indicated that, compared to people low in the need for affect, people high in the need for affect are more likely to (a) possess extreme attitudes across a variety of issues, (b) choose to view emotional movies, and (c) become involved in an emotion-inducing event (the death of Princess Diana). Overall, the results indicate that the need for affect is an important construct in understanding emotion-related processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11497031     DOI: 10.1111/1467-6494.694156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers        ISSN: 0022-3506


  25 in total

1.  Each Medium Tells a Different Story: The Effect of Message Channel on Narrative Persuasion.

Authors:  Nathan Walter; Sheila T Murphy; Lauren B Frank; Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati
Journal:  Commun Res Rep       Date:  2017-03-02

2.  Does Interest in Smoking Affect Youth Selection of Pro-smoking Videos? A Selective Exposure Experiment.

Authors:  Rosie Eungyuhl Bae; Erin K Maloney; Dolores Albarracín; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Over-the-Counter Relief From Pains and Pleasures Alike: Acetaminophen Blunts Evaluation Sensitivity to Both Negative and Positive Stimuli.

Authors:  Geoffrey R O Durso; Andrew Luttrell; Baldwin M Way
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-04-10

4.  Validation and psychometric properties of the Italian Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX-I) scale.

Authors:  Francesco Bruno; Valentina Laganà; Rebecca Pistininzi; Francesca Tarantino; Leslie Martin; Rocco Servidio
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-05-27

5.  Don't know responses to cognitive and affective risk perception measures: Exploring prevalence and socio-demographic moderators.

Authors:  Eva Janssen; Philippe Verduyn; Erika A Waters
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-02-02

6.  Focusing on the negative: cultural differences in expressions of sympathy.

Authors:  Birgit Koopmann-Holm; Jeanne L Tsai
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-09-22

7.  No prior entry for threat-related faces: evidence from temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Antonio Schettino; Tom Loeys; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Concept of "Metaemotion": What is There to Learn From Research on Metacognition?

Authors:  Elisabeth Norman; Bjarte Furnes
Journal:  Emot Rev       Date:  2014-10-13

9.  Affective and Cognitive Orientations in Intergroup Perception.

Authors:  Lukas J Wolf; Ulrich von Hecker; Gregory R Maio
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-04-22

10.  Emotion Regulation in Current and Remitted Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Endre Visted; Jon Vøllestad; Morten Birkeland Nielsen; Elisabeth Schanche
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.