Literature DB >> 11496249

Elimination of mouse allergens in the working environment: assessment of individually ventilated cage systems and ventilated cabinets in the containment of mouse allergens.

S Gordon1, S W Fisher, R H Raymond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laboratory animal allergy is an important occupational disease that is preventable by reduction of exposure to mammalian allergens.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the efficacy of safety equipment in containing mouse urinary protein (MUP)--specifically, individually ventilated cage (IVC) systems and class I--type and class II ventilated cabinets.
METHODS: Six IVC systems (which are used to house rodents) were operated at positive and negative pressure. Air samples (2 L/min) were collected at the cage front, cage back, air inlet, and air outlet, and the MUP was quantified by immunoassay. The background MUP of the IVC study room was compared with that of rooms where mice were housed conventionally or in isolators. Class I--type cabinets (n = 2) were tested during the disposal of soiled litter. Air samples were positioned on and behind the operator and inside the cabinet (n = 2). Personal samples were collected while scientific procedures were performed in a class II cabinet and in the open.
RESULTS: All of the IVC systems contained MUP effectively (>250-fold) when operated at negative pressure. At positive pressure, the "unsealed" IVC racks leaked MUP (1- to 25-fold reduction) but the "sealed" IVC system did not. Class I--type cabinets reduced (10-fold) but did not eliminate exposure during "cleaning out." No MUP was detected when procedures were performed in class II cabinets (protection factor, >10-fold).
CONCLUSION: Safety equipment can substantially reduce exposure to mouse allergen. Allergen exposure in holding rooms will be minimized if mice are housed in IVC systems operated at negative pressure or in "sealed" IVC systems at positive pressure. Respiratory protection should be used whenever "unsealed" IVC systems are operated at positive pressure or during "cleaning out" in class I--type cabinets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11496249     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2001.117258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  13 in total

1.  Is there a need for special preventive medical check-ups in employees exposed to experimental animal dust?

Authors:  Klaus Schmid; Barbara Jüngert; Meta Hager; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Comparison of Indoor Air Quality between 2 Ventilation Strategies in a Facility Housing Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Nicole A Monts de Oca; Mitzi Laughlin; John Jenkins; Cynthia R Lockworth; Iris D Bolton; David W Brammer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Meinir Jones
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.806

4.  Exposure of laboratory animal care workers to airborne mouse and rat allergens.

Authors:  Joshua T Glueck; Richard B Huneke; Hernando Perez; Igor Burstyn
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 5.  Occupational Animal Allergy.

Authors:  Gregg M Stave
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  Environmental assessment and exposure reduction of rodents: a practice parameter.

Authors:  Wanda Phipatanakul; Elizabeth Matsui; Jay Portnoy; P Brock Williams; Charles Barnes; Kevin Kennedy; David Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David Khan; David Lang; Richard Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Christopher Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon Spector; Stephen A Tilles; Dana Wallace; James Sublett; Jonathan Bernstein; Carl Grimes; J David Miller; James Seltzer
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.347

7.  Influence of 5 different caging types and the use of cage-changing stations on mouse allergen exposure.

Authors:  Susan Feistenauer; Ingrid Sander; Jörg Schmidt; Eva Zahradnik; Monika Raulf; Markus Brielmeier
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Laboratory animals and respiratory allergies: the prevalence of allergies among laboratory animal workers and the need for prophylaxis.

Authors:  Erica Ferraz; Luisa Karla de Paula Arruda; Ericson Bagatin; Edson Z Martinez; Andrea A Cetlin; Christian S Simoneti; Amanda S Freitas; José A B Martinez; Marcos C Borges; Elcio O Vianna
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 9.  Rodent allergens.

Authors:  Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.919

10.  Reuse of Disposable Isolation Gowns in Rodent Facilities during a Pandemic.

Authors:  Toi A Collins; Amanda E Sparks; Mary M Walker; Lon V Kendall; Karen M Dobos; Valerie K Bergdall; Judy M Hickman-Davis
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.706

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.