Literature DB >> 11495711

Prospective assessment of symptom palliation for patients attending a rapid response radiotherapy program. feasibility of telephone follow-up.

E Chow1, R Wong, R Connolly, G Hruby, E Franssen, K W Fung, M Vachon, L Andersson, J Pope, L Holden, E Szumacher, T Schueller, K Stefaniuk, J Finkelstein, C Hayter, C Danjoux.   

Abstract

Clinical trials generally include motivated patients with relatively good performance status. This can result in an overestimation of the effectiveness of an intervention. Clinic follow-up protocols for outcome assessment after palliative treatments suffer from high attrition rates. In this study, the feasibility of telephone follow-up for the assessment of symptom palliation in patients receiving outpatient palliative radiotherapy as a tool to evaluate outcome was examined. Patients referred for palliative radiotherapy were asked to rate their symptom distress using the modified Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at initial consultation. Patient demographics and analgesic consumption were collected. For those who received radiotherapy, follow-up was conducted through telephone interviews at week 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 post-treatment using the same modified ESAS and analgesic diary. One hundred ninety patients received radiotherapy to 256 sites from January to August 1999. Seventy-eight patients (41%) died during the 12-week follow-up period. The percentage of surviving patients responding to the telephone interview ranged from 63% to 68% during the 12-week study. Telephone follow-up is a feasible tool for the prospective outcome assessment of symptom palliation in this population. It compares well to clinic visits or mailed questionnaires. However, to improve the follow-up rates, other modalities may also need to be implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495711     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00313-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  18 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of measures of end-of-life care and its outcomes.

Authors:  Richard A Mularski; Sydney M Dy; Lisa R Shugarman; Anne M Wilkinson; Joanne Lynn; Paul G Shekelle; Sally C Morton; Virginia C Sun; Ronda G Hughes; Lara K Hilton; Margaret Maglione; Shannon L Rhodes; Cony Rolon; Karl A Lorenz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Identifying the Prevalence and Correlates of Caregiver-Reported Symptoms in Home Hospice Patients at the End of Life.

Authors:  Veerawat Phongtankuel; Jeanne A Teresi; Joseph P Eimicke; Jian X Kong; Ronald D Adelman; Holly G Prigerson; Sara J Czaja; Ariel Shalev; Ritchell Dignam; Rosemary Baughn; M Cary Reid
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  The psychometric properties of cancer multisymptom assessment instruments: a clinical review.

Authors:  Aynur Aktas; Declan Walsh; Jordanka Kirkova
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Telephone follow-up, initiated by a hospital-based health professional, for postdischarge problems in patients discharged from hospital to home.

Authors:  P Mistiaen; E Poot
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

5.  Symptom profiles and palliative care in advanced pancreatic cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Knut Jørgen Labori; Marianne Jensen Hjermstad; Torunn Wester; Trond Buanes; Jon Håvard Loge
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Review of telephone follow-up experience at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program.

Authors:  Edward Chow; Kin-Wah Fung; Nicole Bradley; Lori Davis; Lori Holden; Cyril Danjoux
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The rapid access palliative radiotherapy program: blueprint for initiation of a one-stop multidisciplinary bone metastases clinic.

Authors:  A Fairchild; E Pituskin; B Rose; S Ghosh; J Dutka; A Driga; P Tachynski; J Borschneck; L Gagnon; S Macdonnell; J Middleton; K Thavone; S Carstairs; D Brent; D Severin
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Continued success of the rapid response radiotherapy program: a review of 2004-2008.

Authors:  Eric de Sa; Emily Sinclair; Gunita Mitera; Jennifer Wong; Cyril Danjoux; Amanda Hird; Stephanie Hadi; Elizabeth Barnes; May Tsao; Edward Chow
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  The success of data collection in the palliative setting--telephone or clinic follow-up?

Authors:  Peiman Haddad; Paula Wilson; Rebecca Wong; Diane Williams; Neena Sharma; Freidele Soban; Michael McLean; Wilfred Levin; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Continued success in providing timely palliative radiation therapy at the Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program: a review of 2008-2012.

Authors:  N Thavarajah; K Wong; L Zhang; G Bedard; E Wong; M Tsao; C Danjoux; E Barnes; A Sahgal; K Dennis; L Holden; N Lauzon; E Chow
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.