Literature DB >> 11495130

Surgical crown lengthening: a 12-month clinical wound healing study.

R Pontoriero, G Carnevale.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical crown lengthening has been proposed as a means of facilitating restorative procedures and preventing periodontal injuries in teeth with structurally inadequate clinical crowns or exposing tooth structure in the presence of deep, subgingival pathologies which may hamper the access for proper restorative measures. The few clinical studies in the current literature on postsurgical soft tissue modifications after crown lengthening procedures report conflicting results. The present study was designed to assess the alterations of the marginal periodontal tissues as an immediate outcome of surgical crown lengthening and over a 12-month healing period.
METHODS: The patient sample included 30 patients (84 teeth) who presented with various conditions hampering proper restorative measures in one or more teeth and, therefore, requiring surgical exposure of tooth substance. After initial supportive therapy, the patients were recalled for a baseline examination, and the following parameters were evaluated at interproximal and buccal/lingual sites of each experimental tooth: plaque index, gingival index, position of the gingival margin, probing depth, and attachment level. After baseline examination, the patients underwent apically positioned flap surgery with osseous and connective tissue attachment resection. During surgery, the amount of resection and the achieved lengthening of the clinical crown were evaluated. The patients were enrolled in a maintenance program including professional tooth cleaning every 2 to 4 weeks. The patients were reexamined 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: 1) Immediately after surgery, a significantly (P < 0.001) increased clinical crown length of 3.7 +/- 0.8 mm (mean) at interproximal and 4.1 +/- 0.9 mm (mean) at buccal/lingual sites was achieved; 2) healing resulted in a statistically significant coronal displacement of the gingival margin of 3.2 +/- 0.8 mm at interproximal (P < 0.001) and 2.9 +/- 0.6 mm at buccal/lingual (P < 0.002) sites; and 3) as a consequence of this postsurgical soft tissue regrowth, the amount of the available tooth structure immediately after surgery decreased to 0.5 +/- 0.6 mm at interproximal sites (P < 0.0015) and to 1.2 +/- 0.7 mm at buccal/lingual sites (P < 0.001) at the 12-month examination.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present clinical investigation demonstrated that during a 1-year period of healing following surgical crown lengthening, the marginal periodontal tissue showed a tendency to grow in a coronal direction from the level defined at surgery. This pattern of coronal displacement of the gingival margin was more pronounced (P < 0.001) in patients with "thick" tissue biotype and also appeared to be influenced by individual variations in the healing response (P < 0.001) not related to age or gender.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495130     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.7.841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  35 in total

1.  Periodontal response to two different subgingival restorative margin designs: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Gianluca Paniz; Jose Nart; Luca Gobbato; Andrea Chierico; Diego Lops; Konstantinos Michalakis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Periodontal evaluation of crown-root fractured teeth following modified crown lengthening surgery.

Authors:  M Zhen; C Wang; W-J Hu; H Zhang; L-S Li; Y-P Wei; K-H Chung
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Gingival biotype revisited-novel classification and assessment tool.

Authors:  Kai R Fischer; Andreas Künzlberger; Nikolaos Donos; Stefan Fickl; Anton Friedmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of crown lengthening on adjacent and non-adjacent sites.

Authors:  Cintia Mirela Guimaraes Nobre; Ana Luisa de Barros Pascoal; Emmanuel Albuquerque Souza; Luciana Machion Shaddox; Patricia Dos Santos Calderon; Ana Rafaela Luz de Aquino Martins; Bruno César de Vasconcelos Gurgel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Aesthetic Crown Lengthening Using Chu Aesthetic Gauges And Evaluation of Biologic Width Healing.

Authors:  Aruna Nautiyal; Sheela Gujjari; Vikas Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

6.  Correlation between gingival phenotype in the aesthetic zone and craniofacial profile-a CBCT-based study.

Authors:  Sa Cha; Sueng Min Lee; Chengxiaoxue Zhang; Zhen Tan; Qing Zhao
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 7.  The management of tooth wear with crowns and indirect restorations.

Authors:  S Varma; A Preiskel; D Bartlett
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

8.  Clinical and histological reaction of periodontal tissues to subgingival resin composite restorations.

Authors:  Carlo Bertoldi; Emanuela Monari; Pierpaolo Cortellini; Luigi Generali; Andrea Lucchi; Sergio Spinato; Davide Zaffe
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  A guide to minimally invasive crown lengthening and tooth preparation for rehabilitating pink and white aesthetics.

Authors:  F Al-Harbi; I Ahmad
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.626

10.  Gingival recession--can orthodontics be a cure?

Authors:  William M Northway
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.