Literature DB >> 11495115

Stationary phantoms and grating induction with oblique inducing gratings: implications for different mechanisms underlying the two phenomena.

J M Brown1, J Gyoba, J G May.   

Abstract

The visibility of stationary visual phantoms and the grating induction (GI) effect were concurrently analyzed with both black and gray inspection areas (IA) using the same subjects with counterbalanced orders of measurements. Oblique inducing gratings were employed in order to compare the visibility of obliquely aligned and vertically misaligned appearances between the two phenomena. Aligned and misaligned phantom responses with a black IA were similar, whereas overall phantom visibility was severely suppressed when the IA was gray. In contrast, misaligned GI dominated with a gray IA, whereas aligned and misaligned GI responses were similar with a black IA. Phantoms appear to be related to visual mechanisms' selectively utilizing relative luminance information between the inducing grating and IA in a manner consistent with more global figural characteristics of the display (e.g., modal and amodal completion). On the other hand, GI may be predominantly due to locally operating brightness/contrast mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11495115     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  21 in total

1.  Local and distal factors in visual grating induction.

Authors:  Q Zaidi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Conflicting figure--ground and depth information reduces moving phantom visibility.

Authors:  J M Brown; N Weisstein
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 3.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional figure-ground perception of two-dimensional pictures.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Disappearance of stationary visual phantoms under high luminant or equiluminant inducing gratings.

Authors:  J Gyoba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visual grating induction.

Authors:  J M Foley; M E McCourt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Optimal occluder luminance for seeing stationary visual phantoms.

Authors:  K Sakurai; J Gyoba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Stationary phantoms: a completion effect without motion and flicker.

Authors:  J Gyoba
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  A spatial frequency dependent grating-induction effect.

Authors:  M E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Flickering phantoms: a motion illusion without motion.

Authors:  C R Genter; N Weisstein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 10.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth.

Authors:  M S Livingstone; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can Contrast-Response Functions Indicate Visual Processing Levels?

Authors:  Bruno G Breitmeyer; Srimant P Tripathy; James M Brown
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.