Literature DB >> 11493772

Can biological markers replace cystoscopy? An update.

H G van der Poel1, F M Debruyne.   

Abstract

Cystoscopy is currently considered the gold standard for the detection of bladder tumors. The role of urine cytology in the initial detection and follow-up of patients is under discussion. New elaborative and rapid assays are available that may circumvent the low sensitivity and poor reproducibility of urine cytology. The methods that have been tested extensively are the nuclear matrix protein (NMP22) assay, the BTA stat assay, and the BTA TRAK enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Both outperform cytology in the detection of low-grade lesions. The specificity of both assays, however, lags behind that of cytology. The data from retrospective analyses are insufficient to justify clinical integration, and the need to replace cystoscopy with these novel assays remains to be proven.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11493772     DOI: 10.1097/00042307-200109000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  19 in total

Review 1.  Circulating tumor cells in genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Francesco Massari; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Francesca Comito; Marta Cubelli; Chiara Ciccarese; Roberto Iacovelli; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Rodolfo Montironi; Andrea Ardizzoni
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-22

2.  Urine cytology and adjunct markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peggy S Sullivan; Jessica B Chan; Mary R Levin; Jianyu Rao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Diagnostic value of urinary microRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingxia Ding; Yi Li; Haifeng Wang; Yongchang Lv; Jianwei Liang; Jiansong Wang; Chong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

4.  Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Jose A Karam; Yair Lotan; Pierre I Karakiewizc
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities.

Authors:  Michael A Tainsky
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-05-04

6.  [Tumor markers for bladder cancer: up-to-date study by the Kiel Tumor Bank].

Authors:  S Hautmann; J Eggers; H Meyhoff; D Melchior; A Munk; M Hamann; M Naumann; P M Braun; K P Jünemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  [Urine-based diagnostics: an update on the Kiel Tumor Bank].

Authors:  S Hautmann; V B L Lokeshwar; K P Juenemann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Guidelines for development of diagnostic markers in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Goebell; Susan L Groshen; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Does phosphorylation of cofilin affect the progression of human bladder cancer?

Authors:  Hong Chung; Bokyung Kim; Seung-Hyo Jung; Kyung-Jong Won; Xiaowen Jiang; Chang-Kwon Lee; So Dug Lim; Sang-Kuk Yang; Ki Hak Song; Hong Sup Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Diagnosis of bladder cancer by immunocytochemical detection of minichromosome maintenance protein-2 in cells retrieved from urine.

Authors:  K Saeb-Parsy; A Wilson; C Scarpini; M Corcoran; S Chilcott; M McKean; B Thottakam; B Rai; G Nabi; D Rana; M Perera; K Stewart; R A Laskey; D E Neal; N Coleman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.