Literature DB >> 11493015

Judgments of Frequency and Recency in a Distributed Memory Model.

Bennet Murdock1, David Smith, Juan Bai.   

Abstract

TODAM is a theory of distributed associative memory based on the convolution-correlation formalism of A. Borsellino and T. Poggio (1973, Kybernetik, 122, 113-122), and TODAM2 is a revised version which includes context, auto-associations for binding, a dual basis for item information, and mediators for associative information. It can explain some complex interactions (differential forgetting and differential attention) between item and associative information. In this paper we derive the basic expressions for the memory-probe dot product for the 2x2 cases (item and pair study crossed with item and pair probe), and then we apply these expressions to judgments of frequency (JOF) and judgments of recency (JOR). We report an experiment which tests both JOF and JOR for single items with post-cuing to control for encoding strategies and suggest an attenuation factor for repetition to improve the fits. With attenuation, TODAM2 can fit the JOR data, but the JOF fits, while not too bad, consistently predict too much dependence between item and associative information. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11493015     DOI: 10.1006/jmps.2000.1339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Psychol        ISSN: 0022-2496            Impact factor:   2.223


  9 in total

1.  The mirror effect and the spacing effect.

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

2.  Judgments of recency and their relation to recognition memory.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

3.  Judgment of frequency versus recognition confidence: repetition and recursive reminding.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

4.  The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains.

Authors:  Marc W Howard; Mrigankka S Fotedar; Aditya V Datey; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  How does repetition affect memory? Evidence from judgments of recency.

Authors:  Douglas L Hintzman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-01

6.  Repetition and brain potentials when recognizing natural scenes: task and emotion differences.

Authors:  Vera Ferrari; Margaret M Bradley; Maurizio Codispoti; Marie Karlsson; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  The role of reminding in the effects of spaced repetitions on cued recall: sufficient but not necessary.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Geoffrey B Maddox; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Generality of a congruity effect in judgements of relative order.

Authors:  Yang S Liu; Michelle Chan; Jeremy B Caplan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-10

Review 9.  Case-based medical informatics.

Authors:  Stefan V Pantazi; José F Arocha; Jochen R Moehr
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.